Examining Equity Theory across Cultures

Abstract

In order to better understand culture's role between perceived equity in one's romantic relationship and relationship satisfaction, we sampled two groups from different cultural backgrounds and attempted to answer the question of whether culture would impact the relationship between equity and relationship satisfaction. We interviewed men and women from the University of Hawai'i (UH), a relatively individualist culture, and from the University of the West Indians in Jamaica (UWI), considered a more collectivistic culture. We had them fill out surveys detailing how equitable they saw their relationship, how important they considered equity to be in their relationship, and how satisfied they were in their relationship. A significant interaction was found between culture and equity in predicting relationship satisfaction. As predicted, in both countries participants considered equity to be of critical importance in romantic relationships. However, men and women in Hawai'i generally considered their relationships to be (slightly) more equitable and far more satisfying than did people in Jamaica. There were also cultural differences in how people reacted to existing inequities. The UH sample was more satisfied in their romantic relationships, especially when the relationship was equitable. However, the UWI sample found their relationships to be most satisfying when they were overbenefitting from their relationships. We posit that the collectivist culture of our UWI participants affected the relationship between equity and relationship satisfaction. Considering the emphasis placed on roles and familial kin support in Jamaica, we can deduce that equity may be of less importance in affecting relationship satisfaction.

Does equity mediate the effects of job demands and job resources on work outcomes?

“…Numerous studies have shown that lack of reciprocity is negatively related to employees' physiological and psychological well-being (Schaufeli, 2006). Aumer-Ryan et al (2007), for example, found the European American and the Asian-American groups were far less satisfied in under-benefited than in balanced and in over-benefited in close relationships. Nevertheless, those who are feeling over-benefited -i.e.…”

A cultural heuristic approach to the study of Jamaican undergraduate students' achievement motivation

“…Family life is central to most Jamaicans and extended family structures are the norm (Aumer‐Ryan, Hatfield, & Fray, ). The concept of family is not limited to just the household but applies to blood and non‐blood kin as kinship bonds extend to close friends and neighbours who contribute to the nurturing and rearing of children.…”

Does equity in ways of showing love matter for marital satisfaction?

“…Studies conducted in the United States indicate that couples consider social justice to be crucial, and considerations of equity have been found to determine who falls in love with whom, mate selection, sexual satisfaction, willingness for extramarital affairs (see Hatfield et al, 2008 for a review). But the notion of social justice in the U.S. is tied to the dominant view of U.S. capitalism -"the more time and energy you invest, the more you're entitled to" (Aumer-Ryan, Hatfield, & Frey, 2007). Surprisingly little studies have been conducted outside the US (with the exception of studies by Bram Buunk and Nico Van Yperen in the Netherlands), and there are even fewer studies conducted in collectivistic cultures of East Asia, or in countries of Central and Eastern Europe.…”