2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Effects of Low-Frequency Ultrasound on Scleral Permeability and Collagen Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective thickness of delivery in this study is comparable to the diffusion distance of choromophores into collagen-based structures by ultrasound with/without microbubbles [ 18 , 30 ]. It was reported that 1–2 mm depth of tumor invasion into lamina propria was a negative prognostic factor of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The effective thickness of delivery in this study is comparable to the diffusion distance of choromophores into collagen-based structures by ultrasound with/without microbubbles [ 18 , 30 ]. It was reported that 1–2 mm depth of tumor invasion into lamina propria was a negative prognostic factor of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A potential concern of scleral ultrasound is that the sclera is a much larger structure than the cornea and that coarse ultrasound application on its surface may lead to morphological or functional injury. However, studies of scleral ultrasound exposure indicate that ultrasound induces no significant changes to the scleral collagen network 100 . These data bolster the idea that ultrasound is a tolerable approach for drug delivery to the posterior segment.…”
Section: Ultrasound As An Ocular Drug Delivery Toolmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, studies of scleral ultrasound exposure indicate that ultrasound induces no significant changes to the scleral collagen network. 100 These data bolster the idea that ultrasound is a tolerable approach for drug delivery to the posterior segment.…”
Section: Pre-clinicalmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Year Animal model Target Coefficient Quality of study reporting [69] 2002 Rabbit Transcorneal to anterior segment 0.36 Insufficient [62] 2004 Rabbit Transcorneal to anterior segment 0.39 Insufficient [60] 2004 Rabbit Transcorneal to anterior segment 0.53 Poor [36] 2006 Rabbit Intrascleral 0.63 Average [37] 2007 Rat Intraconjunctival 0.56 Poor [64] 2008 Bovine Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.42 Poor [82] 2009 Rat Subretinal 0.46 Poor [75] 2009 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake and blood-retinal barrier 0.39 Insufficient [38] 2009 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake and subretinal 0.51 Average [77] 2010 Mouse Intravitreal and vitreal-retinal uptake 0.34 Insufficient [76] 2010 Rat Blood-retinal barrier 0.46 Poor [33] 2010 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.59 Poor [61] 2010 Rabbit Intrascleral 0.53 Poor [28] 2011 Rat Intra-ciliary 0.61 Average [154] 2011 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.61 Average [66] 2012 Rat Blood-retinal barrier 0.61 Average [65] 2012 Rabbit Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.56 Poor [34] 2012 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.56 Poor [71] 2013 Rabbit Intrascleral 0.58 Poor [70] 2013 Rabbit Transcorneal to anterior segment 0.44 Poor [39] 2013 Rabbit Transscleral to posterior segment 0.59 Poor [44] 2014 Mice Blood-retinal barrier 0.56 Poor [16] 2014 Rabbit Transcorneal to anterior segment 0.66 Average [74] 2014 Rabbit Transscleral to posterior segment 0.47 Poor [49] 2015 Pig Intrascleral 0.33 Insufficient [83] 2015 Rat Subretinal 0.54 Poor [35] 2016 Rat Subretinal 0.59 Poor [73] 2016 Rabbit Intraconjunctival 0.43 Poor [46] 2016 Rabbit Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.46 Poor [17] 2017 Rat Vitreal-retinal uptake 0.61 Average [72] 2017 Rabbit Intrascleral 0.50 Poor [40] 2017 Pig & Cow Intravitreal and vitreal-retinal uptake 0.56 Poor…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, ultrasound power may also be measured using a hydrophone, whereby the hydrophone is initially positioned at the area of highest pressure from the transducer (ISP), and the plane parallel to the spatial peak position is measured in a 1 cm x 1 cm grid using the "pressure squared interval mode." The data obtained is filtered by omitting values ≤ 0.25 of the peak intensity [113], and the intensity can be calculated by the equation [43,73]:…”
Section: Powermentioning
confidence: 99%