Computations With Markov Chains 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2241-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Methods for the Transient Analysis of Nonhomogeneous Continuous Time Markov Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a nonhomogeneous continuous time Poisson process with intensity function λ ( t ), the interarrival times of the events are functions of m ( t ) where m()t=0tλ()τitalicdτ . For example, T 1 and T 2 are the first and the second interarrival times with probability density functions: fT1()t=λ()tem()t, fT2()t=0λ()τλ()t+τem()t+τitalicdτ. Evidently, if a perturbation occurs in the different time instances in [0, t ], the change in the values of fT1()t and fT2()t will be different. Considering what happens in a nonhomogeneous continuous time Poisson process, it can be deduced that the system unavailability change at time t , using the nonhomogeneous continuous time MC, is a function of the perturbation occurrence time; this assertion is proved as follows.…”
Section: Considering Perturbation Time In Importance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a nonhomogeneous continuous time Poisson process with intensity function λ ( t ), the interarrival times of the events are functions of m ( t ) where m()t=0tλ()τitalicdτ . For example, T 1 and T 2 are the first and the second interarrival times with probability density functions: fT1()t=λ()tem()t, fT2()t=0λ()τλ()t+τem()t+τitalicdτ. Evidently, if a perturbation occurs in the different time instances in [0, t ], the change in the values of fT1()t and fT2()t will be different. Considering what happens in a nonhomogeneous continuous time Poisson process, it can be deduced that the system unavailability change at time t , using the nonhomogeneous continuous time MC, is a function of the perturbation occurrence time; this assertion is proved as follows.…”
Section: Considering Perturbation Time In Importance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniqueness of Y (t) is a technical matter which we do not consider, because in the phylogenetic case there are extra restrictions which led to the unique solution (17). Considering again the general case, we write…”
Section: Generalized Pulley Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990's some work has been published on the computation of transient state probabilities for inhomogeneous Markovian models without rewards [67,58,68]. A more recent paper [62] characterizes the performability distribution in inhomogeneous MRMs through a coupled system of partial differential equations that is solved through discretization, and used to derive systems of ordinary differential equations to determine moments of accumulated reward.…”
Section: Computing Distributions and Expected Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%