Ex-vivo characterization of circulating colon cancer cells distinguished in stem and differentiated subset provides useful biomarker for personalized metastatic risk assessment

Abstract

BackgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) represent one of the most interesting target in improving diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Herein we evaluate the possibility of using an emo-cytometric approach on the evaluation of the heterogeneous population of CTCs to improve personalized metastatic risk assessment. We benchmarked ex vivo behavior of distinct subsets of circulating colon tumor cells with correspondent clinical behavior of patients from which we isolated CTCs.MethodsIsolation and CTC expansion were performed by a gradient protocol. In vitro characterization was determined by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, western blotting and proteomic profiling. Cell sorter was performed with immunomagnetic beads. Confocal microscopy was used to evaluate tissue sections. Kaplan Mayer curves was cared for through Medcalc program.ResultsWe collected heterogeneous CTCs, derived from the whole blood of seven patients affected by colon cancer, expressing CD133posCD45neg (5 ± 1) and (2 ± 1) and CK20posCD45neg of (29 ± 3) (11 ± 1) cells/ml in Dukes D and A stage respectively. Proliferation rate of 57 ± 16 %, expression for CXCR4pos of 18 ± 7 % and detectable levels of IL-6, IL-8 and SDF-1 cytokines in conditioned culture medium characterized short-time expanded–CTCs (eCTCs). ECTCs organized in tumor sphere were CD45negCD133pos while in adhesion were CXCR4posCK20pos. These two subsets were separately injected in mice. The first group of xenografts developed superficial lesions within 2 weeks. In the second group, in absence of growing tumour, the survival of injected eCTCs was monitored through SDF-1 serum levels detection. The detection of human cancer cells expressing CK20, in mice tissues sections, suggested a different biological behaviour of injected eCTC-subsets: tumorigenic for the first and disseminating for the second. The benchmarking of the experimental data with the clinical course highlights that patients with prevalence of circulating cancer stem cells (CD45negCD133pos) have a lower overall survival. Conversely, patients with prevalence of circulating differentiated cells (CXCR4posCK20pos) have a low disease-free survival.ConclusionOn the basis of the heterogeneous composition and despite the low number of CTCs, it was possible to distinguish two subgroups of CTCs, suggesting a different clinical outcome. CTC-subsets detailing is useful to better define the metastatic–risk personalized score thus improving disease management and reducing patient care cost.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0876-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Tailoring super-hydrophobic properties of electrochemical biosensor for early cancer detection

“…The cellular suspension isolated in correspondence of the working density phase was recovered in specific medium. The cell culture was expanded for 14 days (short-term cultivation) and the conditioned medium (aged 14 days old) was collected [14].…”

“…The culture mediums were conditioned during a short-time cultivation of fourteen days performed as previously described [13]. This time is sufficient to enrich the culture medium of soluble fraction of proteins produced by cells [14,15]. Moreover, different metabolic condition and generation of free radicals can influence its electrolytic state.…”

Innate and Adaptive Immunity Linked to Recognition of Antigens Shared by Neural Crest-Derived Tumors

“…Differential expression of CXCR4 is critical for the maturation and selection of B cells [26,27] and sustained by hypoxic gradient. The SDF1/CXCR4 is involved in the inflammation surrounding metastatic progression of many carcinomas [28] comprising the NCDTs like in schwannoma [29].…”

Clinical Proteomics for Precision Medicine: The Bladder Cancer Case

“…Improvements have been made concerning the use of molecular profiling to guide the therapeutic intervention across a broad range of pathological conditions in the field of oncology, cardiology and ophthalmology, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) . Patient stratification was performed on the basis of proteome analysis alone, or in combination with multi ‐omics profiling data from tissue or body fluids.…”

“…However, the therapeutic benefit of the molecular‐guided treatment was not obvious . Malara et al targeted the assessment of the risk of metastasis of patients with colon cancer using circulating tumor cells (CTCs), supplemented with proteomics profiling . Based on the growth pattern in vitro, short‐time expanded CTCs could be clearly categorized into two subsets, i.e.…”