2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40893-016-0003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving landscapes in multiple sclerosis research: adaptive designs and novel endpoints

Abstract: The increasing amount of highly effective treatment options in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires innovative clinical trial design strategies. These strategies may encompass the application of adaptive designs as well as the adoption of innovative primary outcome measurements. The offered advantages would include, among others, shorter study follow-up periods and reduction in the number of patients either on placebo or on non-suitable dosages of the small molecules or biological products under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13] NEDA may provide a more sensitive and comprehensive measure of capturing overall treatment benefit and has been proposed as a primary endpoint in future pivotal Phase III clinical studies. 14,15 NEDA is increasingly recognized as an important treatment goal for patients with RMS 16 and has been shown to be informative in the prediction of long-term disability progression both independent of DMT type 17 (cohort study) and in the core and extension periods of clinical trial patient populations. 18 As a binary outcome, NEDA status and its failure are often driven by MRI components of the measure and hence are particularly influenced by the frequency of MRI assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] NEDA may provide a more sensitive and comprehensive measure of capturing overall treatment benefit and has been proposed as a primary endpoint in future pivotal Phase III clinical studies. 14,15 NEDA is increasingly recognized as an important treatment goal for patients with RMS 16 and has been shown to be informative in the prediction of long-term disability progression both independent of DMT type 17 (cohort study) and in the core and extension periods of clinical trial patient populations. 18 As a binary outcome, NEDA status and its failure are often driven by MRI components of the measure and hence are particularly influenced by the frequency of MRI assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%