Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields

Elliott, Robert; Fischer, Constance T.; Rennie, David L.

doi:10.1348/014466599162782

Cited by 1,740 publications

(1,428 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,354

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some aspects of good practice guidelines (Barker, Pistrang & Elliott, 2016;Elliott, Fischer & Rennie, 1999) do not seem to have been adhered to, such as disclosure of the researcher's perspective (Granek et al, 2016;Jönsson et al, 2011;Maskill et al, 2010;Rusner et al, 2012;Tranvag & Kristokkerson, 2008); and the carrying out of credibility checks through 'analytic auditing' (Rusner et al, 2012Tranvag & Kristokkerson, 2008 or 'testimonial validity' (Jönsson et al, 2011;Maskill et al, 2010;Rusner et al, 2012). These limitations reduce the confidence that can be placed in their findings.…”

Section: Department Of Health (2014mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In line with good practice guidelines for qualitative research (Barker & Pistrang, 2005;Elliott et al, 1999;Santiago-Delefosse, Gavin, Bruchez, Roux & Stephen, 2016), a number of methods were used to ensure the credibility of the results. A consensus approach was employed throughout the process of data collection and analysis.…”

Section: Credibility Checksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In accordance with good practice guidelines (Barker & Pistrang, 2005;Elliott et al, 1999), the author's perspective is outlined, in order to aid the reader in and that manic episodes might be particularly challenging.…”

Section: Researcher Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

‘Between a rock and a hard place’: family members’ experiences of supporting a relative with bipolar disorder

Baruch

Pistrang

Barker

2018

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Department Of Health (2014mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Credibility Checksmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

‘Between a rock and a hard place’: family members’ experiences of supporting a relative with bipolar disorder

Baruch

Pistrang

Barker

2018

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A final master table of super-ordinate and subthemes was produced. The researcher also conducted a credibility check (Elliot et al, 1999) using an independent assessor to evaluate the themes.…”

Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

The postnatal support needs of mothers with an intellectual disability

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University's research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher's website (a subscription may be required.) NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Midwifery. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive versio n was subsequently published as: Design: A qualitative design was used and data were collected using a semi-structured interview format and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Setting:The study took place in community settings in Scotland.Participants: Six mothers with intellectual disabilities were interviewed about their experiences. Measurements and findings:Two super-ordinate themes are discussed with accompanying subthemes: challenges of providing support and how support was delivered. Key conclusions:The mothers valued formal postnatal care, but this was secondary to informal support. How mothers perceived the support impacted on its effectiveness and building effective relationships with professionals presented challenges. Implications for practice:The study suggests the structure and quality of the wider support networks of mothers with an intellectual disability are central and should be taken account of by professionals. Providing information and advice in ways that validates the mother's role is also important, particularly as the mother's perception of how help is given can impact on the degree to which mothers engage with professionals.

show abstract

“…It is important to 'own one's perspective' when conducting qualitative research (Elliott, Fischer, & Rennie, 1999), and from the outset the interviewer/MFGL was open about certain professional and personal details. MFGL was known to all of the participants, as they had met prior to the interview (i.e.…”

Section: Interviewermentioning

confidence: 99%