2015
DOI: 10.1101/026021
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary quantitative genomics ofPopulus trichocarpa

Abstract: Forest trees generally show high levels of local adaptation and efforts focusing on understanding adaptation to climate will be crucial for species survival and management. Here, we address fundamental questions regarding the molecular basis of adaptation in undomesticated forest tree populations to past climatic environments by employing an integrative quantitative genetics and landscape genomics approach. Using this comprehensive approach, we studied the molecular basis of climate adaptation in 433 Populus t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Admixed individuals with these introgressed P. balsamifera haplotypes are restricted to northern and central areas of the geographical range of P. trichocarpa, and have been assigned to distinct climate clusters (Porth et al . ). Based on historical climate data, northern and north‐central regions have significantly lower mean annual temperature (MAT: 4.2 °C), number of frost‐free days (NFFD: 175 days), and mean annual precipitation (MAP: 744 mm) than coastal and southern regions (MAT: 9.5 °C, NFFD: 287 days, MAP 2805 mm) (Porth et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Admixed individuals with these introgressed P. balsamifera haplotypes are restricted to northern and central areas of the geographical range of P. trichocarpa, and have been assigned to distinct climate clusters (Porth et al . ). Based on historical climate data, northern and north‐central regions have significantly lower mean annual temperature (MAT: 4.2 °C), number of frost‐free days (NFFD: 175 days), and mean annual precipitation (MAP: 744 mm) than coastal and southern regions (MAT: 9.5 °C, NFFD: 287 days, MAP 2805 mm) (Porth et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on historical climate data, northern and north‐central regions have significantly lower mean annual temperature (MAT: 4.2 °C), number of frost‐free days (NFFD: 175 days), and mean annual precipitation (MAP: 744 mm) than coastal and southern regions (MAT: 9.5 °C, NFFD: 287 days, MAP 2805 mm) (Porth et al . ), suggesting potential niche differentiation between populations with and without the introgressed region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two orthologs of the nitrate transporter AtNRT2 (Potri.009G008500, Potri.009G008600), from the Major Facilitator Superfamily (PF07690), were associated with a number of phenological (bud set, yellowing, leaf drop, growing period, height growth cessation) and biomass traits (height, height gain) here and in a previous association analysis (McKown et al ., ). One of the AtNRT2 orthologs (Potri.009G008600), which was also associated with damage by disease in a different association study (La Mantia et al ., ), showed exceptionally strong correlations with geoclimate variables including latitude and temperature (Geraldes et al ., ; Porth et al ., ), and had SNPs that were F ST outliers in a landscape genomic analysis (Geraldes et al ., ). These previous reports used the same P. trichocarpa populations but a different genotyping method and association mapping approach than those used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Populus, populations are more am-227 phistomatous at Northern latitudes with shorter growing seasons that may select for 228 faster carbon assimilation (McKown et al, 2014; Kaluthota et al, 2015). Latitudinal 229 variation Populus trichocarpa is due mostly to adaptive variation in adaxial stomatal 230 density (McKown et al, 2014;Porth et al, 2015). Stomatal density rather than size may have responded more readily to selection because there is no genetic covariance 232 between ab-and adaxial stomatal density, permitting independent evolution(Porth 233 et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%