2016
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00011-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Ecology of Prokaryotic Immune Mechanisms

Abstract: SUMMARYBacteria have a range of distinct immune strategies that provide protection against bacteriophage (phage) infections. While much has been learned about the mechanism of action of these defense strategies, it is less clear why such diversity in defense strategies has evolved. In this review, we discuss the short- and long-term costs and benefits of the different resistance strategies and, hence, the ecological conditions that are likely to favor the different strategies alone and in combination. Finally,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
188
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
1
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this scenario, the evolutionary loss of motility from bacteria reared on homogenous media in the laboratory is common (Fux, Shirtliff, Stoodley, & Costerton, ; Sellek et al., ), and the cycling of bacteria between fly and food has been demonstrated empirically for Acetobacter isolated from laboratory Drosophila (Blum, Fischer, Miles, & Handelsman, ). These effects may be compounded by selection for nonmotility exerted by certain bacteriophage that utilize the flagellum as receptor (van Houte, Buckling, & Westra, ) and the energetic costs of the proton motive force required for motility (Edwards, Sockett, & Brookfield, ; Koskiniemi, Sun, Berg, & Andersson, ). Interestingly, the host immune system is unlikely to be a factor selecting against motility because, although the bacterial flagellin protein is recognized by the immune system of many animals and plants, Drosophila and other insects apparently lack the receptors that recognize this protein (Buchon, Silverman, & Cherry, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this scenario, the evolutionary loss of motility from bacteria reared on homogenous media in the laboratory is common (Fux, Shirtliff, Stoodley, & Costerton, ; Sellek et al., ), and the cycling of bacteria between fly and food has been demonstrated empirically for Acetobacter isolated from laboratory Drosophila (Blum, Fischer, Miles, & Handelsman, ). These effects may be compounded by selection for nonmotility exerted by certain bacteriophage that utilize the flagellum as receptor (van Houte, Buckling, & Westra, ) and the energetic costs of the proton motive force required for motility (Edwards, Sockett, & Brookfield, ; Koskiniemi, Sun, Berg, & Andersson, ). Interestingly, the host immune system is unlikely to be a factor selecting against motility because, although the bacterial flagellin protein is recognized by the immune system of many animals and plants, Drosophila and other insects apparently lack the receptors that recognize this protein (Buchon, Silverman, & Cherry, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a small fraction of the spacers, protospacers have been reported, often in viral and plasmid genomes, but the substantial majority of the spacers remain without a match, representing vast CRISPR "dark matter" (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-known systems include restriction-modification, CRISPR-Cas, abortive infection, prokaryotic Argonaute, and the recently discovered BREX [1417] (Figure 2B). Of these, restriction-modification systems are the most prevalent, appearing in approximately 95% of all sequenced bacterial genomes [18], and commonly are considered the greatest barrier to DNA transfer.…”
Section: Delivering and Maintaining Exogenous Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%