2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds: initial frequency of target site-based resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium rigidum

Abstract: The frequency of individuals resistant to two acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides in three previously untreated populations of Lolium rigidum was determined. The frequency of individuals resistant to the sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron-methyl varied from 2.2 × 10 −5 to 1.2 × 10 −4 and the frequency of individuals resistant to the imidazolinone herbicide imazapyr varied from 1 × 10 −5 to 5.8 × 10 −5 depending on the population. Application of sulfometu-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
110
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
5
110
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several factors modify the rate of evolution of herbicide resistance in a region; however the most important factors controlling this phenomenon are the intensity of herbicide use and the initial frequency of the herbicide resistant gene (Maxwell & Mortlmer, 1994;Winkler et al, 2002). The initial frequency of ALS-resistant cells in Nicotiana tabacum cell culture was 10 -8 (Harms & Dimaio, 1991) and in Gossipium hirsutum cell culture was 10 -7 (Rajasekaran et al, 1996), implying that in a few generations of the constant use of an ALS-inhibiting resistant biotypes would dominate a weed community (Maxwell & Mortlmer, 1994). However, recent research indicates that in Lolium rigidum populations never sprayed with ALS-inhibiting herbicides, the initial frequency of individuals resistant to this group of herbicides can be as high as 10 -4 (Preston & Powles, 2002), explaining the appearance of resistant biotypes with only 3 years of constant use of herbicides from this group (Powles et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors modify the rate of evolution of herbicide resistance in a region; however the most important factors controlling this phenomenon are the intensity of herbicide use and the initial frequency of the herbicide resistant gene (Maxwell & Mortlmer, 1994;Winkler et al, 2002). The initial frequency of ALS-resistant cells in Nicotiana tabacum cell culture was 10 -8 (Harms & Dimaio, 1991) and in Gossipium hirsutum cell culture was 10 -7 (Rajasekaran et al, 1996), implying that in a few generations of the constant use of an ALS-inhibiting resistant biotypes would dominate a weed community (Maxwell & Mortlmer, 1994). However, recent research indicates that in Lolium rigidum populations never sprayed with ALS-inhibiting herbicides, the initial frequency of individuals resistant to this group of herbicides can be as high as 10 -4 (Preston & Powles, 2002), explaining the appearance of resistant biotypes with only 3 years of constant use of herbicides from this group (Powles et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is the high initial frequency reached by the adaptive allele before the environmental change. In weed populations, initial frequency of herbicide resistance allele in unexposed populations also depends on the fitness cost and its associated dominance (Preston and Powles, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herbicide selection of large populations of initially herbicidesusceptible plant species selects for the rare individuals expressing resistance genes (reviewed by Jasieniuk et al, 1996). Therefore, it is generally accepted that the dynamics of herbicide resistance evolution are strongly influenced by the initial frequency of major resistance genes in weed populations under herbicide selection (Preston and Powles, 2002). However, a potential concomitant evolutionary path to herbicide resistance in weed populations under selection could be the recurrent enrichment of several additive minor genes, which, in combination, endow sufficient resistance for a substantial number of individuals to survive at the recommended (label) herbicide use rates (Neve and Powles, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%