2021
DOI: 10.3390/ani11113058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Hearing Loss and Unrelated Toxoplasmosis in a Free-Ranging Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)

Abstract: Evidence of hearing impairment was identified in a harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) on the basis of scanning electron microscopy. In addition, based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry, there were signs of unrelated cerebral toxoplasmosis. The six-year old individual live stranded on the Dutch coast at Domburg in 2016 and died a few hours later. The most significant gross lesion was multifocal necrosis and haemorrhage of the cerebrum. Histopathology of the brain revealed extensive necrosis and haemo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the pattern of sensory cell loss in two cases suggested individual apical variability instead of lesions (Morell et al, 2022), the other two showed evidence of sensory cell loss that is compatible with noise exposure. More details on these cases have been published elsewhere (Morell et al, 2015;Morell et al, 2021).…”
Section: Pathological Findings Compatible With Noise-induced Hearing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the pattern of sensory cell loss in two cases suggested individual apical variability instead of lesions (Morell et al, 2022), the other two showed evidence of sensory cell loss that is compatible with noise exposure. More details on these cases have been published elsewhere (Morell et al, 2015;Morell et al, 2021).…”
Section: Pathological Findings Compatible With Noise-induced Hearing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several infectious agents have, however, been targeted and published separately, including on the prevalence of Brucella spp. (Maio et al, 2014), mycoses, specifically Aspergillus fumigatus (Kapetanou et al, 2020), herpesvirus (van Beurden et al, 2015), and Toxoplasma gondii (van de Velde et al, 2016;Morell et al, 2021).…”
Section: Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part, this is due to the difficulty to provide a large number of individuals whose ears can be fixed rapidly after their death. To date, 3 out of 21 (14.3%) harbor porpoise individuals that had the beginning of the apex in a good preservation status for diagnosis, showed evidences of lowfrequency hearing loss (Morell et al, 2015;Morell et al, 2021;Morell et al, 2022a;Ijsseldijk et al, 2022). However, this prevalence may be underestimated since not all 21 individuals had a complete information of the apex.…”
Section: Low-frequency Hearing Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because hearing is fundamental to cetaceans, changes to their auditory capabilities may impact their ability to carry out vital activities, such as navigation, feeding, and communication. Previous studies have shown that the cochlea of the harbor porpoise, as in terrestrial mammals, contains two types of auditory sensory cells: the inner hair cells (IHCs) and the outer hair cells (OHCs) (Morell et al, 2015;Morell et al, 2020;Morell et al, 2021;Morell et al, 2022a). Within the organ of Corti (or hearing organ), the sensory cells are arranged in one single row of IHCs and three rows of OHCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTS assessments are therefore a perfect tool for estimating effects on hearing. Affected hearing can potentially affect the survival of an individual (Mann et al, 2010;Morell et al, 2017;Morell et al, 2021a;Morell et al, 2021b), decreasing fitness and possibly leading to long-term population consequences (King et al, 2015). Temporarily affected hearing thresholds have been found in harbor porpoises after the exposure to single noise exposures with high received levels (Lucke et al, 2009), but also after an exposure to multiple events with lower received levels (Kastelein et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%