2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05191.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of a collision between the Yucatán Block and Mexico in the Miocene

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe present the evidence for an anomalous southwest-dipping slab in southern Mexico. The main evidence comes from a clear receiver function image along a seismic line across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and is also supported by a previous global tomographic model. The slab dips at 35 • , is approximately 250 km in length and appears to truncate the Cocos slab at about 120 km depth. We hypothesize that the slab was created by subduction of oceanic lithosphere prior to the collision of the Yucatán Bloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
89
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Locations of the converted phases at top and bottom of the subducted oceanic crust are indicated as red and blue dots, respectively. These locations for central Mexico beneath the active arc are confirmed by the predicted arrivals from the synthetic seismograms based on the ray-based algorithm , and the locations for southern Mexico are by the predicted arrivals from the two-dimensional RF finite-difference modeling (Kim et al, 2011). 300 km from the Middle America Trench Kim et al, 2010Kim et al, , 2012. Although the estimate of the thickness slightly trades off with its velocity, the thickness of the oceanic crust is constrained at 7-8 km at the shallow-to-flat regime near the Pacific coast by the finite-difference modeling Kim et al, 2010) with a priori constraint of 5-7 km thick oceanic crust at the trench (Shor and Fisher, 1961).…”
Section: Geometries Of the Subducted Cocos Oceanic Crust In Mexicomentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Locations of the converted phases at top and bottom of the subducted oceanic crust are indicated as red and blue dots, respectively. These locations for central Mexico beneath the active arc are confirmed by the predicted arrivals from the synthetic seismograms based on the ray-based algorithm , and the locations for southern Mexico are by the predicted arrivals from the two-dimensional RF finite-difference modeling (Kim et al, 2011). 300 km from the Middle America Trench Kim et al, 2010Kim et al, , 2012. Although the estimate of the thickness slightly trades off with its velocity, the thickness of the oceanic crust is constrained at 7-8 km at the shallow-to-flat regime near the Pacific coast by the finite-difference modeling Kim et al, 2010) with a priori constraint of 5-7 km thick oceanic crust at the trench (Shor and Fisher, 1961).…”
Section: Geometries Of the Subducted Cocos Oceanic Crust In Mexicomentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Fewer stations and thus a smaller dataset for MASE above the TMVB reflects difficulties in picking phases corresponding to the top and bottom of the oceanic crust in the steeply dipping geometry (see Section 2.2). We also note that the seismic multiples in the teleseismic data recorded from both MASE and VEOX arrays are very weak in our high-frequency passband (Kim et al, 2010(Kim et al, , 2011, and so it is difficult to clearly identify reverberated phases and measure timings of both forward conversions and reverberations to recover Vp/Vs of the subducted low-velocity oceanic crust as done by Audet et al (2009) for Cascadia subduction zone. In particular, the reverberations at the steep interface ( 4 501) cause converted phases to travel over larger lateral offsets, and consequently are beyond the array (MacKenzie et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2012).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations