2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EVIDENCE FOR X-RAY SYNCHROTRON EMISSION FROM SIMULTANEOUS MID-INFRARED TO X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF A STRONG Sgr A* FLARE

Abstract: This paper reports measurements of Sgr A* made with NACO in L ′ -band (3.80 µm), Ks-band (2.12 µm) and H-band (1.66 µm) and with VISIR in N-band (11.88 µm) at the ESO VLT 1 , as well as with XMM-Newton at X-ray (2-10 keV) wavelengths. On 4 April, 2007, a very bright flare was observed from Sgr A* simultaneously at L ′ -band and X-ray wavelengths. No emission was detected 1 The Very Large Telescope (VLT) at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) on Paranal, Chile: Program IDs 179.B-0261(A) and Program ID: 079.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
351
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
24
351
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these models are consistent with the observed millimeter variability of SgrA*. However, since Dexter et al (2009Dexter et al ( , 2010) concentrate only on modeling the (sub-)millimeter emission, their modeling could not reproduce the observed NIR/X-ray flares and corresponding (sub-)millimeter flares (Eckart et al 2008;Marrone et al 2008;Dodds-Eden et al 2009;Yusef-Zadeh et al 2008, which are most likely physically associated. The authors also clearly state that -in the framework of their modeling -it is unclear how their description of variability is linked to the NIR/X-ray flare activity.…”
Section: Sub-mm Variability From a Magnetized Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, these models are consistent with the observed millimeter variability of SgrA*. However, since Dexter et al (2009Dexter et al ( , 2010) concentrate only on modeling the (sub-)millimeter emission, their modeling could not reproduce the observed NIR/X-ray flares and corresponding (sub-)millimeter flares (Eckart et al 2008;Marrone et al 2008;Dodds-Eden et al 2009;Yusef-Zadeh et al 2008, which are most likely physically associated. The authors also clearly state that -in the framework of their modeling -it is unclear how their description of variability is linked to the NIR/X-ray flare activity.…”
Section: Sub-mm Variability From a Magnetized Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…All NIR flux densities taken from the literature were corrected to a value of A K = 2.46 (Schödel et al 2010). For the L -band flares reported by Dodds-Eden et al (2009;4 April 2007) and by Trap et al (2010;1 April 2009), we corrected the L -band flux densites to an extinction of A L = 1.23 (Schödel et al 2010) and extrapolated to the Ks-band assuming a spectral index of 0.7 ± 0.3 (Hornstein et al 2007; see also Bremer et al 2011). In this sample, we also included an X-ray flare that had not been detected simultaneously in the NIR (Marrone et al 2008).…”
Section: The Sample Of Simultaneous Nir/x-ray Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accelerated electrons of Lorentz factor γ ∼ 10 3 −10 6 are required to produce the NIR and X-ray emission via synchrotron emission and/or inverse A&A 540, A41 (2012) Compton scattering (Markoff et al 2001;Yuan et al 2003Yuan et al , 2004Dodds-Eden et al 2009;Eckart et al 2006b). The possible origins of the hot electrons include magnetic reconnection in the accretion flow (Baganoff et al 2001;Markoff et al 2001), stochastic acceleration (Liu et al 2006), fluctuations in the accretion rate, or even the tidal disruption of a small infalling body such as an asteroid (Čadež et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%