2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Two Independent Factors that Modify Brain Networks to Meet Task Goals

Abstract: Summary Humans easily and flexibly complete a wide variety of tasks. To accomplish this feat, the brain appears to subtly adjust stable brain networks. Here we investigate what regional factors underlie these modifications, asking whether networks are altered at (a) regions activated by a given task, or (b) hubs that interconnect different networks. We used fMRI ‘functional connectivity’ (FC) to compare networks during rest and three distinct tasks requiring semantic judgments, mental rotation, and visual cohe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
170
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
16
170
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we showed preferential modulation of connections within those large-scale networks, while the limited number of modulated between-network connections exhibited greatest task specificity. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that local processing is supported by out-ofnetwork connections during task performance (Gratton et al, 2016). The idea that the resting functional architecture provides a common baseline further supports the need for a full and independent resting state acquisition to allow capturing the baseline functional landscape across the frequency range, as using in-task-OFF-block-resting-state data will be constrained by the task mind-set and relaxation of task potentiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Here, we showed preferential modulation of connections within those large-scale networks, while the limited number of modulated between-network connections exhibited greatest task specificity. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that local processing is supported by out-ofnetwork connections during task performance (Gratton et al, 2016). The idea that the resting functional architecture provides a common baseline further supports the need for a full and independent resting state acquisition to allow capturing the baseline functional landscape across the frequency range, as using in-task-OFF-block-resting-state data will be constrained by the task mind-set and relaxation of task potentiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, both residual and resting-state spontaneous correlations largely reflect the intrinsic organization of PFC. Although task-evoked changes in largescale spontaneous correlations are relatively small, they are statistically reliable (12,35) and influence behavior (27,36). Moreover, context-dependent information processing is also supported by dynamic changes in large-scale task-evoked correlations (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions are based on multiple neuroimaging studies showing consistent activation of the fronto‐parietal network (FPN) during effortful task execution [Duncan, ; Dux et al, ; Klein et al, ; Landmann et al, ]. However, regional brain activation during tasks does not provide exact information whether activated areas actually integrate distinct brain modules [Gratton et al, ]. In terms of the network science, entire network integration can be potentially achieved through connector hubs—highly central nodes that are connected to multiple modules [Guimera and Amaral, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%