2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0405-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a large double-cruciform DNA structure on the X chromosome of human and chimpanzee

Abstract: The human X chromosome consists of a high number of large inverted repeat (IR) DNA sequences which fulfill all requirements for formation of cruciform DNA structures. Such alternative DNA structures are suggested to have a great impact in altering the chromatin architecture and function. Our comprehensive analysis of the corresponding orthologous nucleotide sequences of an IR sequence from Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes revealed that most of the nucleotide differences between the two species are symmetrical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transfected methylated MAGE-A1 transgenes do not undergo promoter demethylation, and unmethylated MAGE-A1 transgenes become methylated except for the 5′ region in cancer cells (34). Complex chromatin architecture including formation of double cruciform DNA(35) that potentially affects access of methyl binding proteins, DNMTs, and transcription factors such as CTCF, BORIS and SP1(8, 32, 36) may contribute to coordinated repression/activation of CT-X genes within large inverted repeats (7). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfected methylated MAGE-A1 transgenes do not undergo promoter demethylation, and unmethylated MAGE-A1 transgenes become methylated except for the 5′ region in cancer cells (34). Complex chromatin architecture including formation of double cruciform DNA(35) that potentially affects access of methyl binding proteins, DNMTs, and transcription factors such as CTCF, BORIS and SP1(8, 32, 36) may contribute to coordinated repression/activation of CT-X genes within large inverted repeats (7). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, whereas inverted repeats may suppress random nucleotide changes arising from within their repeating arms [107], they nevertheless represent a structural unit capable of changing genomic orientation over time. We and others [110] have proposed that large inverted repeats may promote strand exchange and form stem-loop structures, which may account for these features [109]. Accordingly (Fig.…”
Section: Genome-wide Analyses and Evolutionary Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Long IRs (>500 bp), which are rare in the human genome, have been found at sites of gross chromosomal rearrangements (Kurahashi and Emanuel, 2001), and can cause DSBs, stimulating recurrent constitutional translocations in sperm leading to chromosomally unbalanced offspring (Ho et al, 2012; Kurahashi and Emanuel, 2001; Kurahashi et al, 2004; Tanaka et al, 2006). Long IRs can also contribute to deletions, recombination and gene amplifications (Akgun et al, 1997; Cunningham et al, 2003; Gordenin et al, 1993; Losch et al, 2007; Mizuno et al, 2009; Nag and Kurst, 1997; Tanaka et al, 2002; VanHulle et al, 2007; Zhou et al, 2001). In contrast, short perfect IRs are abundant in the human genome, with ~80% being under 100 bp (Wang and Leung, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%