2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11051407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Wood Coverage on Building Facades Towards Sustainability

Abstract: This study explores the acceptance of different wood coverages on building facades with the aim of optimization of materials, and in turn improving overall sustainability. It firstly develops the principal physical variables and evaluation criteria; then, test models are created using an orthogonal design experiment; finally, two evaluation methods are used to comprehensively test acceptance, based on a questionnaire and an eye-tracking study. The results show that: (1) The effects of the amount of wood covera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-fifth of the studies used willingness to pay (WTP) measurement methods and applied, for example, conjoint analysis (e.g., Bernard et al, 2018;Fell et al, 2006;Luo et al, 2017;Thompson et al, 2010) and discrete choice experiment (Holopainen et al, 2017;Shoji et al, 2014). Qualitative studies with, for example, focus group discussions (e.g., Häyrinen et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2019) and interviews (e.g., Viholainen et al, 2020) were not popular, even though some of the reviewed studies recognized the need for qualitative methods as well (Roos & Nyrud, 2008a;Toivonen, 2012). However, only four of the studies (Jonsson et al, 2008;Jonsson, 2005;Ridoutt et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2019) used the mixed methods approach with qualitative and quantitative methods.…”
Section: Methodology (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One-fifth of the studies used willingness to pay (WTP) measurement methods and applied, for example, conjoint analysis (e.g., Bernard et al, 2018;Fell et al, 2006;Luo et al, 2017;Thompson et al, 2010) and discrete choice experiment (Holopainen et al, 2017;Shoji et al, 2014). Qualitative studies with, for example, focus group discussions (e.g., Häyrinen et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2019) and interviews (e.g., Viholainen et al, 2020) were not popular, even though some of the reviewed studies recognized the need for qualitative methods as well (Roos & Nyrud, 2008a;Toivonen, 2012). However, only four of the studies (Jonsson et al, 2008;Jonsson, 2005;Ridoutt et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2019) used the mixed methods approach with qualitative and quantitative methods.…”
Section: Methodology (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies with, for example, focus group discussions (e.g., Häyrinen et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2019) and interviews (e.g., Viholainen et al, 2020) were not popular, even though some of the reviewed studies recognized the need for qualitative methods as well (Roos & Nyrud, 2008a;Toivonen, 2012). However, only four of the studies (Jonsson et al, 2008;Jonsson, 2005;Ridoutt et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2019) used the mixed methods approach with qualitative and quantitative methods.…”
Section: Methodology (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations