Evaluation of various deformable image registration algorithms for thoracic images

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy of one commercially available and three publicly available deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for thoracic four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) images. Five patients with esophagus cancer were studied. Datasets of the five patients were provided by DIR-lab (dir-lab.com) and consisted of thoracic 4D CT images and a coordinate list of anatomical landmarks that had been manually identified. Expert landmark correspondence was used for evaluating DIR spatial accuracy. First, the manually measured displacement vector field (mDVF) was obtained from the coordinate list of anatomical landmarks. Then the automatically calculated displacement vector field (aDVF) was calculated by using the following four DIR algorithms: B-spine implemented in Velocity AI (Velocity Medical, Atlanta, GA, USA), free-form deformation (FFD), Horn–Schunk optical flow (OF) and Demons in DIRART of MATLAB software. Registration error is defined as the difference between mDVF and aDVF. The mean 3D registration errors were 2.7 ± 0.8 mm for B-spline, 3.6 ± 1.0 mm for FFD, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm for OF and 2.4 ± 1.2 mm for Demons. The results showed that reasonable accuracy was achieved in B-spline, OF and Demons, and that these algorithms have the potential to be used for 4D dose calculation, automatic image segmentation and 4D CT ventilation imaging in patients with thoracic cancer. However, for all algorithms, the accuracy might be improved by using the optimized parameter setting. Furthermore, for B-spline in Velocity AI, the 3D registration error was small with displacements of less than ∼10 mm, indicating that this software may be useful in this range of displacements.

Accumulation of rectum dose‐volume metrics for prostate external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy: Evaluating deformably registered dose distribution addition using parameter‐based addition

“…The algorithm performs the registration in multiple passes from low resolution to high resolution using a B‐splines algorithm with the Mattes mutual information metric and the limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno optimiser. The DIR is described in additional detail elsewhere . A detailed evaluation of the registration, including qualitative visual inspection by experts, has previously been reported .…”

Prostate external beam radiotherapy combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy: dose-volume parameters from deformably-registered plans correlate with late gastrointestinal complications

“…The HDR CT was registered to the EBRT CT using rigid registration followed by a B-splines multi-pass DIR in Velocity Advanced Imaging 2.8.1 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, US) [20]. The registration process has been described in detail previously [20,21].…”

“…The registration process has been described in detail previously [20,21]. Visual inspections for the 118 patients were undertaken by authors (initials CRM, VL and CIT) and did not identify any major registration misalignments (e.g.…”

Combined lineage mapping and gene expression profiling of embryonic brain patterning using ultrashort pulse microscopy and image registration

“…[79][80][81] We first evaluated the accuracy of registration of the data at the scale of the tissue to characterize the global accuracy. [79][80][81] We first evaluated the accuracy of registration of the data at the scale of the tissue to characterize the global accuracy.…”