2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-016-5255-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two momentum control variable schemes and their impact on the variational assimilation of radarwind data: Case study of a squall line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forecasts are launched twice a day from 1 September to 20 September 2008 to provide a large number of prediction samples for the estimation of background error covariance. According to the differences between samples, estimate the covariance matrix of background error [18], as follows:…”
Section: Wrfda 3dvar Data Assimilation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The forecasts are launched twice a day from 1 September to 20 September 2008 to provide a large number of prediction samples for the estimation of background error covariance. According to the differences between samples, estimate the covariance matrix of background error [18], as follows:…”
Section: Wrfda 3dvar Data Assimilation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [17] (2008) updated the hydrometers in the NWP model directly by applying general analytic relationship when assimilating the radar reflectivity in two storm cases with promising results. As far as the authors know, there is very few published work with radar reflectivity within the framework of WRFDA with UV control variables (Li et al, (2016) [18], Sun et al, (2016) [13]). The control variables related to hydrometeors have become one of the key technologies to effectively assimilate hydrometeor-related observations, such as radar reflectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another natural choice is to use velocity components (U,V) as control variables for wind analyses (CV option 7; CV7), which includes U component, V component, full temperature (T), full surface pressure (Ps), and pseudo-relative humidity (RHs). The effects of the two momentum control variable options-stream function velocity potential (ψ,χ) and horizontal wind components (U,V)-in radar Vr data assimilation have been discussed in previous studies [13]. To assimilate the hydrometers of radar reflectivity data, the total water qt (sum of water vapor, cloud water, and cloud rain) is used as the moisture CV instead of the RH s (Xiao et al, 2007) [14].…”
Section: B Modeling In Wrfda-3dvarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system assimilates observations of the surface and upper air, multiple radar data, the Cross-track Infrared Sounder, and the Advanced Himawari Imager radiance as well as plenty of other sources (Li et al, 2016;Li X et al, 2019). The model physical schemes utilize the WRF Single-Moment 6-class Microphysics (Hong, 2006a), the Monin-Obukhov surface layer (Monin and Obukhov, 1954), the Noah land surface (Chen and Dudhia, 2001), the Yonsei University planetary boundary layer (Hong S. Y. et al, 2006), the rapid radiative transfer model longwave radiation (Mlawer et al, 1997), the Dudhia shortwave radiation (Dudhia, 1989), and the Kain-Fritsch cumulus parameterization (Kain and Fritsch, 1992;Kain, 2004).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%