2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00399.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Two Commercial Systems and a New Identification Scheme Based on Solid Substrates for Identifying Coagulase‐Negative Staphylococci from Bovine Mastitis

Abstract: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), mainly isolated from bovine mastitis (n = 89, representing 11 different species), were used to evaluate two commercial identification systems: ID 32 Staph and Staph-Zym. The level of agreement between the ID 32 Staph and Staph-Zym systems and conventional methods was 77 and 94%, respectively. An alternative method, based on solid biochemical substrates, is also presented. This can be used for identifying novobiocin-sensitive CNS strains from bovine mastitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tube coagulate test was determined and evaluated for coagulation after 3 and 24 h of incubation. All isolates identified as NSA and CNS based on colony morphology, Gram staining (positive), catalase reaction (positive), and coagulase test (positive) were subjected to species identification by using all the conventional biochemical methods described by Thorberg and Brandstrom (2000). For novobiocin-sensitive CNS isolates identified in samples, a simplified identification system, novobiocin-sensitive CNS built on biochemical tests was used (Thorberg and Brandstrom, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tube coagulate test was determined and evaluated for coagulation after 3 and 24 h of incubation. All isolates identified as NSA and CNS based on colony morphology, Gram staining (positive), catalase reaction (positive), and coagulase test (positive) were subjected to species identification by using all the conventional biochemical methods described by Thorberg and Brandstrom (2000). For novobiocin-sensitive CNS isolates identified in samples, a simplified identification system, novobiocin-sensitive CNS built on biochemical tests was used (Thorberg and Brandstrom, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All isolates identified as NSA and CNS based on colony morphology, Gram staining (positive), catalase reaction (positive), and coagulase test (positive) were subjected to species identification by using all the conventional biochemical methods described by Thorberg and Brandstrom (2000). For novobiocin-sensitive CNS isolates identified in samples, a simplified identification system, novobiocin-sensitive CNS built on biochemical tests was used (Thorberg and Brandstrom, 2000). To confirm the isolates as Staphylococcus, definitive identification of all strains included in the study was performed targeting the Staphylococcus genus-specific 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (fragment of 756 bp); F: AAC TCT GTT ATT AGG GAA GAA CA and R: CCA CCT TCC TCC GGT TTG TCA CC as previously described (Zhang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inoculation of Peptone agar (P agar) supplemented with 7 mg of acriflavine per ml was conducted according to [37]. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were identified according to [36] with 2 modifications: (1) a commercially available substrate tablet (Rosco, Taastrup, Denmark) was used to test β -galactosidase activity; and (2) the acetone test was performed as described by [28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, miniaturized panels of biochemical tests are considered expensive and are not accurate for the identification of Staphylococcus spp. in samples collected from animals (16,17). Molecular biology techniques offer advantages due to their more rapid speed and specificity for the identification of microorganisms (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%