2006
DOI: 10.5414/cpp44163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvastatin XL and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, the coadministration of cyclosporin A increased C max and the AUC of pravastatin 7–8 times and 12 times higher, respectively, in humans (41). In contrast, those of fluvastatin were only 2–3 times higher with cyclosporin A than with mono‐administration (42). This may explain the reason why the reported cases of rhabdomyolysis is greater for pravastatin than fluvastatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the coadministration of cyclosporin A increased C max and the AUC of pravastatin 7–8 times and 12 times higher, respectively, in humans (41). In contrast, those of fluvastatin were only 2–3 times higher with cyclosporin A than with mono‐administration (42). This may explain the reason why the reported cases of rhabdomyolysis is greater for pravastatin than fluvastatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the statin therapy in cyclosporine A-treated transplant recipients should be initiated at the lower end of the dosage range. In contrast, fluvastatin has a low interaction with cyclosporine A because it is mainly metabolized by CYP2C9 (Holdaas et al, 2006).…”
Section: Statins and Cancer: Pros And Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pravastatin and fluvastatin are the preferred lipid-lowering therapies in solid organ transplant recipients, because of the relatively low risk of interaction with CsA (Holdaas et al, 2006;Skalicka et al, 2009). However, in patients with severe hyperlipidemia the efficacy of these two statins may become inadequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%