Interspeech 2017 2017
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2017-819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Neurological State of People with Parkinson’s Disease Using i-Vectors

Abstract: The i-vector approach is used to model the speech of PD patients with the aim of assessing their condition. Features related to the articulation, phonation, and prosody dimensions of speech were used to train different i-vector extractors. Each i-vector extractor is trained using utterances from both PD patients and healthy controls. The i-vectors of the healthy control (HC) speakers are averaged to form a single i-vector that represents the HC group, i.e., the reference i-vector. A similar process is done to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speaker model based on i-vectors (Dehak et al, 2011a), the spoken language (Dehak et al, 2011b), gender, age, and others. We hypothesize that i-vectors may contain also information related to speech impairments like those developed by PD patients (Garcia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speaker model based on i-vectors (Dehak et al, 2011a), the spoken language (Dehak et al, 2011b), gender, age, and others. We hypothesize that i-vectors may contain also information related to speech impairments like those developed by PD patients (Garcia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], i-vectors were used for the representation of word segments produced by 15 dysarthric speakers resulting in some important correlations between automatically predicted and reference intelligibility measures. Finally, in [14], the authors proposed an approach based on a cosine distance between the i-vector representation of a speech production (test) and two reference i-vectors representing each normal and dysarthric speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the study of [21], we performed our experiments using four different feature sets. The first consisted of 20 MFCCs, obtained from 30 ms wide windows; and the rest of the feature sets were built by articulation, phonation, and prosody, respectively.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%