2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01297.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Manchester clinical supervision scale: Norwegian and Swedish versions

Abstract: Translation of an instrument for cross-cultural nursing research is important, although there are methodological limitations associated with construct validity. IMPLICATION FOR NURSE MANAGERS: Instruments for the evaluation of nursing care are necessary in order to formulate strategies at a managerial level. Nurse managers who encourage nurses to attend supervision promote professional development and enhance patient safety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, after cultural adaptation Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) changes into EFA to explore a favorite structural model. [21] Therefore, after translation and cultural adaptation process, we conducted EFA with four factors via principal components analysis followed by a varimax rotation to test the factor constructs of all the 19 items for the P-CBI subscales. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett's test of sphericity were also assessed to confirm sample adequacy for extraction of the factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, after cultural adaptation Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) changes into EFA to explore a favorite structural model. [21] Therefore, after translation and cultural adaptation process, we conducted EFA with four factors via principal components analysis followed by a varimax rotation to test the factor constructs of all the 19 items for the P-CBI subscales. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett's test of sphericity were also assessed to confirm sample adequacy for extraction of the factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were employees in critical care units affiliated with one major university of medical sciences in Tehran. As Severinsson reported, “Translation of questionnaires for cross-cultural research is needed”; methodological problems for validity may happen, for this reason an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is essential (29). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a structural equation modelling (SEM) method, which is used to determine the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model and the data obtain from study cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All instruments had satisfactory Cronbach alpha values, namely 0.58 -0.94. [34] However, it could be argued that data were only collected at a single point in time and the students were from one college. Comparing them with a group of nursing students from another University College would have provided a larger sample.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] The instrument was translated into Norwegian, [21] after which its hypothezised seven-factor structural model was tested and verified. [34] The participants used a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to respond to items such as "My supervisor gives me support and encouragement and Clinical supervision sessions facilitate reflective practice".…”
Section: Research Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%