Evaluation of the equine mental foramen block: cadaveric and in vivo injectate diffusion

Rawlinson, Jennifer E.; Bass, Luke; Campoy, Luis; Lesser, Craig; Prytherch, Benjamin

doi:10.1016/j.vaa.2018.06.002

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies show a prevalence of AMF that range between 2% and 13% [43][44][45], with an average reported prevalence of 8.3%, according to the cumulative results [46].…”

Section: Prevalence and Morphometric Measurement Of Amfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common Anatomical Variations of Neurovascular Canals and Foramina Relevant to Oral Surgeons: A Review

Sferlazza

Zaccheo²,

Campogrande

et al. 2022

Anatomia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: The anatomical variations of neurovascular canals that are encountered in oral surgery are often overlooked by anatomy textbooks or provided with insufficient information. The aim of this study is to analyze the most common variations, describing their morphology, prevalence and clinical implications. (2) Methods: A review of published literature from the 20th century onwards was performed using the PubMed electronic database as well as anatomical textbooks. The variations being investigated were: retromolar canal (RMC) and foramen (RMF), accessory mental foramen (AMF), midline (MLF) and lateral (MLF) lingual foramina and canalis sinuosus (CS). (3) Results: Anatomical variants of neurovascular canals and foramina have a significant incidence and important clinical implications in the most common oral surgery procedures such as third molar extraction, bone harvesting and implantology. (4) Conclusions: Knowledge of these variables is highly important both for students to have a more accurate anatomical awareness and for professional surgeons to be able to provide better diagnoses and prevent complications during oral surgery techniques.

show abstract

“…Studies show a prevalence of AMF that range between 2% and 13% [43][44][45], with an average reported prevalence of 8.3%, according to the cumulative results [46].…”

Section: Prevalence and Morphometric Measurement Of Amfmentioning

confidence: 99%