2011
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02214-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Respiratory Specimens

Abstract: A total of 217 specimens submitted for routine smear and culture from three different sites within the western United States were used to evaluate the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (for research use only) (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Overall agreement compared to culture was 89% (98% for smear positives and 72% for smear negatives) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
160
5
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
16
160
5
19
Order By: Relevance
“…When testing at the lower limits of any assay, variability is to be expected due to factors such as sampling. 12 And other reason for such contradiction between culture positivity and assay negativity in same specimens occurred because only two available biochemical tests (viz. Niacin and 68ºC heat stable catalase test) were used in the present study for identification without any further molecular characterization of M. tuberculosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When testing at the lower limits of any assay, variability is to be expected due to factors such as sampling. 12 And other reason for such contradiction between culture positivity and assay negativity in same specimens occurred because only two available biochemical tests (viz. Niacin and 68ºC heat stable catalase test) were used in the present study for identification without any further molecular characterization of M. tuberculosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large number of studies evaluating Xpert on pulmonary specimens [5,6,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; the sensitivity varies from 95% to 100% in smear-positive sputa, and from 47% to 77% in smear-negative ones. Our data score high within these ranges, despite the well-known lower yield of extrapulmonary samples in term of sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal ini pernah dilaporkan pada penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Marlowe dkk. 19 di Amerika tahun 2011. Pada 130 sampel yang sensitif terhadap Rif berdasarkan uji kepekaan konvensional, terdapat 3 sampel resisten Rif dengan PCR GeneXpert MTB/RIF, setelah dilakukan sekuensing terhadap 3 sampel tersebut tidak ditemukan mutasi pada gen rpoB.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified