Evaluation of the Akinosi mandibular block technique in oral surgery

Evaluation of Three Block Anesthesia Methods for Pain Management During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis

“…After selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)21222324252627. (flow diagram was shown in Supplemental data).…”

“…These publications date from 1896 to 2013. Among split trials, Allen L 1896 compared IANB and V-A with respect to their pain control success rate, their onset time and their positive aspiration rate21. Jiacai He 2000 treated the IANB as a control and utilized V-A as the experimental intervention; the study evaluated the success rate and the positive aspiration rate.…”

Evaluation of Three Block Anesthesia Methods for Pain Management During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis

“…After selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)21222324252627. (flow diagram was shown in Supplemental data).…”

“…These publications date from 1896 to 2013. Among split trials, Allen L 1896 compared IANB and V-A with respect to their pain control success rate, their onset time and their positive aspiration rate21. Jiacai He 2000 treated the IANB as a control and utilized V-A as the experimental intervention; the study evaluated the success rate and the positive aspiration rate.…”

Comparison of Efficacy of Halstead, Vazirani Akinosi and Gow Gates Techniques for Mandibular Anesthesia

“…However, Todorovic et al [5] reported higher success rate with IANB than Gow Gates block; on the contrary, Montagnese et al [6] reported both the techniques to be equivalent. Sisk [7] and Todorovic et al [5] found the Vazirani Akinosi technique equivalent to IANB. However, Donkor et al [8], Yucel and Hutchinson [9] and Martínez Gonzales et al [10] reported IANB superior to Vazirani Akinosi.…”

Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of the Conventional Inferior Alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani-Akinosi Techniques

“…Vreeland et al (29) found an incidence of 30% for buccal nerve anesthesia with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. For the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, previous studies have found buccal nerve anesthesia occurred 80% (15) and 71% (16) of the time. Gonzalez et al (18) found that patients anesthetized with the Vazirani-Akinosi technique required more buccal nerve reinforcements than those with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block.…”

“…Previous studies (16 -18) of the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, evaluating either lip anesthesia or extractions, reported a higher success rate with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block than the Vazirani-Akinosi technique. With an extraction model, Sisk (15) and Todorovic et al (8) found the 2 techniques were equivalent. Again, extractions might not always indicate pulpal anesthesia.…”

Evaluation of Three Block Anesthesia Methods for Pain Management During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis

“…After selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)21222324252627. (flow diagram was shown in Supplemental data).…”

“…These publications date from 1896 to 2013. Among split trials, Allen L 1896 compared IANB and V-A with respect to their pain control success rate, their onset time and their positive aspiration rate21. Jiacai He 2000 treated the IANB as a control and utilized V-A as the experimental intervention; the study evaluated the success rate and the positive aspiration rate.…”

Comparison of Efficacy of Halstead, Vazirani Akinosi and Gow Gates Techniques for Mandibular Anesthesia

“…However, Todorovic et al [5] reported higher success rate with IANB than Gow Gates block; on the contrary, Montagnese et al [6] reported both the techniques to be equivalent. Sisk [7] and Todorovic et al [5] found the Vazirani Akinosi technique equivalent to IANB. However, Donkor et al [8], Yucel and Hutchinson [9] and Martínez Gonzales et al [10] reported IANB superior to Vazirani Akinosi.…”

Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of the Conventional Inferior Alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani-Akinosi Techniques

“…Vreeland et al (29) found an incidence of 30% for buccal nerve anesthesia with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. For the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, previous studies have found buccal nerve anesthesia occurred 80% (15) and 71% (16) of the time. Gonzalez et al (18) found that patients anesthetized with the Vazirani-Akinosi technique required more buccal nerve reinforcements than those with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block.…”

“…Previous studies (16 -18) of the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, evaluating either lip anesthesia or extractions, reported a higher success rate with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block than the Vazirani-Akinosi technique. With an extraction model, Sisk (15) and Todorovic et al (8) found the 2 techniques were equivalent. Again, extractions might not always indicate pulpal anesthesia.…”

Evaluation of Three Block Anesthesia Methods for Pain Management During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis

“…After selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)21222324252627. (flow diagram was shown in Supplemental data).…”

“…These publications date from 1896 to 2013. Among split trials, Allen L 1896 compared IANB and V-A with respect to their pain control success rate, their onset time and their positive aspiration rate21. Jiacai He 2000 treated the IANB as a control and utilized V-A as the experimental intervention; the study evaluated the success rate and the positive aspiration rate.…”

Comparison of Efficacy of Halstead, Vazirani Akinosi and Gow Gates Techniques for Mandibular Anesthesia

“…However, Todorovic et al [5] reported higher success rate with IANB than Gow Gates block; on the contrary, Montagnese et al [6] reported both the techniques to be equivalent. Sisk [7] and Todorovic et al [5] found the Vazirani Akinosi technique equivalent to IANB. However, Donkor et al [8], Yucel and Hutchinson [9] and Martínez Gonzales et al [10] reported IANB superior to Vazirani Akinosi.…”

Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of the Conventional Inferior Alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani-Akinosi Techniques

“…Vreeland et al (29) found an incidence of 30% for buccal nerve anesthesia with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. For the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, previous studies have found buccal nerve anesthesia occurred 80% (15) and 71% (16) of the time. Gonzalez et al (18) found that patients anesthetized with the Vazirani-Akinosi technique required more buccal nerve reinforcements than those with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block.…”

“…Previous studies (16 -18) of the Vazirani-Akinosi technique, evaluating either lip anesthesia or extractions, reported a higher success rate with the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block than the Vazirani-Akinosi technique. With an extraction model, Sisk (15) and Todorovic et al (8) found the 2 techniques were equivalent. Again, extractions might not always indicate pulpal anesthesia.…”