2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of supervised chemometric methods for sample classification by Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A seleção de uma ferramenta quimiométrica dependerá da aplicação analítica desejada. 70 Em se tratando de análise por LIBS, o uso da quimiometria é praticamente indispensável devido à grande quantidade de dados. A Figura 3 mostra o quanto o uso da LIBS associada a ferramentas quimiométricas vem crescendo ao longo dos anos.…”
Section: Libs E Quimiometriaunclassified
“…A seleção de uma ferramenta quimiométrica dependerá da aplicação analítica desejada. 70 Em se tratando de análise por LIBS, o uso da quimiometria é praticamente indispensável devido à grande quantidade de dados. A Figura 3 mostra o quanto o uso da LIBS associada a ferramentas quimiométricas vem crescendo ao longo dos anos.…”
Section: Libs E Quimiometriaunclassified
“…Two chemometric algorithms, PCA and SIMCA, were implemented to exploit the multivariate nature of the LIBS data, indicating that LIBS can potentially differentiate and discriminate among pharmaceutical tablets; it demonstrated an excellent prospective classification accuracy using the SIMCA algorithm, with an average correct classification rate of approximately 94% . Moncayo et al evaluated 7 supervised chemometrics methods (NN, SIMCA, PLS‐DA, linear discriminant analysis [LDA], classification and regression tree, logistic regression, and SVM) in a real‐world application for classifying human bone remains with similar elemental compositions based on LIBS measurements. Three validation procedures—sensitivity (internal validation), generalization ability, and robustness (independent external validation)—were used to assess the performance of each chemometrics model, and NN outperformed the others in terms of sensitivity, generalization ability, and robustness, whereas the others did not show significant accuracy in discriminating highly similar bone samples.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the following lines, subject to a pronounced self-absorption leading to the line reversal, were eliminated from the dataset: 308. 22 22-nm line were also eliminated. The 266-nm laser line, visible on the spectra because of the persistence of the intensifier, was also removed.…”
Section: Spectral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft independent modeling of class analogy was used for the analysis of uranium concentrate and carbonate grains . Now, the comparison of performances of different techniques is a growing topic in LIBS, as shown by recent papers on the subject . In quantitation by LIBS, chemometric methods are used to cope with nonlinearities between the emission signal and the concentration and with matrix effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation