Evaluation of success of alveolar cleft bone graft performed at 5 years versus 10 years of age

Dissaux, C.; Bodin, F.; Grollemund, Bruno; Bridonneau, Thomas; Kauffmann, I.; Mattern, Jean-François; Bruant-Rodier, C.

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.003

Cited by 74 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is encouraging in terms of the network's ability to meet the patient's need for early management, which is the best guarantee of success in the treatment of these diseases [26]. Early diagnosis does not depend on the centre (regions versus Paris).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Management of rare diseases of the Head, Neck and Teeth: results of a French population-based prospective 8-year study

Friedlander

Choquet

Galliani

et al. 2017

Orphanet J Rare Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In the last ten years, national rare disease networks have been established in France, including national centres of expertise and regional ones, with storage of patient data in a bioinformatics tool. The aim was to contribute to the development and evaluation of health strategies to improve the management of patients with rare diseases. The objective of this study has been to provide the first national-level data concerning rare diseases of the head, neck and teeth and to assess the balance between demand and supply of care in France. Methods: Centres of expertise for rare diseases record a minimum data set on their clinical cases, using a list of rare Head, Neck and Teeth diseases established in 2006. The present analysis focuses on 2008 to 2015 data based on the Orphanet nomenclature. Each rare disease RD "case" was defined by status "affected" and by the degree of diagnostic certainty, encoded as: confirmed, probable or non-classifiable. Analysed parameters, presented with their 95% confidence intervals using a Poisson model, were the following: time and age at diagnosis, proportions of crude and standardized RD prevalence by age, gender and geographical site. The criteria studied were the proportions of patients in Paris Region and the "included cases geography", in which these proportions were projected onto the other French Regions, adjusting for local populations.Results: In Paris Region, estimated prevalence of these diseases was 5.58 per 10,000 inhabitants (95% CI 4.3-7.1). At December 31st 2015, 11,342 patients were referenced in total in France, of whom 7294 were in Paris Region. More than 580 individual clinical entities (ORPHA code) were identified with their respective frequencies. Most abnormalities were diagnosed antenatally. Nearly 80% of patients recorded come to Paris hospitals to obtain either diagnosis, care or follow up. We observed that the rarer the disease, the more patients were referred to Paris hospitals. Conclusions:A health network covering a range of aspects of the rare diseases problematic from diagnostics to research has been developed in France. Despite this, there is still a noticeable imbalance between health care supply and demand in this area.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Management of rare diseases of the Head, Neck and Teeth: results of a French population-based prospective 8-year study

Friedlander

Choquet

Galliani

et al. 2017

Orphanet J Rare Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Это также идет вразрез с резуль-татами, полученными другими исследователями [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Субъективно наблюдалась повышенная резорбция трансплантата в возрастной груп-пе 9-10 лет, что можно связать с прорезыванием постоянного клыка в область регенерата.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Osteoplasty of the Maxilla in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate by a Mandibular Bone Graft With the Use of 3d Computer Modeling

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nine studies 22,[26][27][28]30,33,34,36,37 used intraoral radiographs to either evaluate the bone level in the grafted area or the stage of canine eruption. Eight studies 20,21,23,24,31,32,35,38 utilized CT or CBCT images for different reasons: 1. measurement of bone volume and/or height, 2. acquisition of pre-and post-surgical superimpositions, and 3. fabrication of 3D models of the cleft and grafted areas. Although the studies using CT or CBCT considered three-dimensional images to be superior to two-dimensional images, one study 36 found good accuracy with the Bergland and modified Witherow analyses.…”

Section: Methods Of Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The four articles [21][22][23][24] retrieved during the search update in addition to the ones initially selected 20,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] accounted to a total of 19 eligible articles. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] An overview of the entire selection process can be found in the PRISMA 39 flow diagram below ( Figure 1). Their data were extracted and scrutinized to determine the risk of bias (Table 2).…”

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of early and conventional autogenous secondary alveolar bone graft in children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review

Pinheiro

Drummond

Frota

et al. 2020

Orthod Craniofacial Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature is scarce on studies comparing secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) performed early at approximately 5-6 years and at the conventional time at 9-11 years. This systematic literature review(SLR) aimed to compare clinical outcomes after two different timings of SABG in children with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Methods: The inclusion criteria were autogenous iliac grafts and the following study designs: case control, cohort, clinical controlled trial (CCT), randomized CCT (RCCT), and previous SLRs. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest and Google Scholar were the primary databases. Two calibrated examiners worked independently to select the articles. The MINORS evaluation method for surgical non-RCTs was used to assess for quality. Results: 1,111 articles were retrieved and 19 qualified. Different clinical and radiographic outcomes such as bone level, periodontal status, canine eruption and cleft-side tooth survival were evaluated by different assessment methods such as CBCT volume, computed tomography, periodontal evaluation, panoramic, intraoral radiographs, and Bergland scale. No RCCT or meta-analysis was found. None of the studies received the ideal score, which is 16 for non-comparison studies and 24 for comparison studies. Conclusion: Methodological variation, lack of standardization for initial cleft dimension and low-quality level rendered a fair comparison unfeasible. Although further studies are necessary, it can be assumed that early SABG also can be an acceptable option, but this was based on a single study with a reasonable level of evidence.

show abstract

Evaluation of success of alveolar cleft bone graft performed at 5 years versus 10 years of age

Cited by 74 publications

References 18 publications

Management of rare diseases of the Head, Neck and Teeth: results of a French population-based prospective 8-year study

Management of rare diseases of the Head, Neck and Teeth: results of a French population-based prospective 8-year study

Osteoplasty of the Maxilla in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate by a Mandibular Bone Graft With the Use of 3d Computer Modeling

Comparison of early and conventional autogenous secondary alveolar bone graft in children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About