2014
DOI: 10.3920/cep143003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of skin displacement in the equine neck

Abstract: Kinematic studies, using reflective skin markers, are commonly used to investigate equine joint motion in equitation science and for rehabilitation purposes. In order to interpret the registrations accurately, the degree of skin displacement has been described for the limbs and back, but not yet for the neck. The aim of the present study was to measure sagittal plane skin displacement in the equine neck. Radiopaque skin markers were applied to the skin over the first six cervical vertebrae of six healthy horse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of left and right circles was not randomised, but short intervals between repeats likely reduced the influence of left-right circle order. Skin markers are susceptible to skin displacement 40 . However, pairwise comparisons between conditions, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of left and right circles was not randomised, but short intervals between repeats likely reduced the influence of left-right circle order. Skin markers are susceptible to skin displacement 40 . However, pairwise comparisons between conditions, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the findings or effects described in this study may be more difficult to observe when walking over ground due to a more variable motion pattern. Further, marker placement errors and skin displacement artefacts [ 26 , 27 ] are well-recognized, confounding factors in kinematic studies. However, the visual similarity of the motion patterns of T6, T10, T13, and the tubera spinae scapulae suggest that skin displacement or asymmetric marker misplacement were unlikely to explain the asymmetry pattern that was exhibited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%