2022
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.355142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Single Exon Deletions in DMD/BMD: Technical and Analytical Concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirmation of copy number changes was achieved using MLPA, qPCR, or repeat array CGH analysis. This multi-step approach was chosen to mitigate the false positive rate associated with MLPAonly technology, which can reach 6%-15% for single exon deletions in the DMD gene due to improper hybridization/ligation binding of the probe (Dama et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmation of copy number changes was achieved using MLPA, qPCR, or repeat array CGH analysis. This multi-step approach was chosen to mitigate the false positive rate associated with MLPAonly technology, which can reach 6%-15% for single exon deletions in the DMD gene due to improper hybridization/ligation binding of the probe (Dama et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%