2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00060-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of several potential bioactive agents for reducing protozoal activity in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the inhibition of methanogenesis by saponins from Sapindus saponaria was more effective in defaunated animals (29%), than in the animals with naturally numerous rumen microflora (14%) (Hess et al, 2003a). Thus it was proved that a decrease in methane production is not a result of a limitation on protozoan number only, which was confirmed in other research both in the in vitro and in vivo conditions (Hristov et al, 2003;Baah et al, 2007;Benchaar et al, 2008). A probable reason for the observed differences may be: 1. a degree of bacterial cell degradation (Newbold et al, 1997), 2. saliva production disorder (Teferedegne, 2000), and 3. the possibility of saponin deactivation by animal saliva amylase (Odenyo et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Effect Of Saponins On the Process Of Methanogenesis In Tsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, the inhibition of methanogenesis by saponins from Sapindus saponaria was more effective in defaunated animals (29%), than in the animals with naturally numerous rumen microflora (14%) (Hess et al, 2003a). Thus it was proved that a decrease in methane production is not a result of a limitation on protozoan number only, which was confirmed in other research both in the in vitro and in vivo conditions (Hristov et al, 2003;Baah et al, 2007;Benchaar et al, 2008). A probable reason for the observed differences may be: 1. a degree of bacterial cell degradation (Newbold et al, 1997), 2. saliva production disorder (Teferedegne, 2000), and 3. the possibility of saponin deactivation by animal saliva amylase (Odenyo et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Effect Of Saponins On the Process Of Methanogenesis In Tsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although the toxicity of saponins towards protozoa seems to be widespread and non-specific (Valdez et al, 1986;Diaz et al, 1993;Hristov et al, 2003), some authors found no effect on protozoal number (Sliwinski et al, 2002;Hristov et al, 2003), or even observed an increase (Abreu et al, 2004;Eryavuz and Dehority, 2004). This may be due to the capacity of some rumen bacteria to hydrolyse saponins into free glycosyl and sapogenin fractions (Newbold et al, 1997), thus removing their toxicity against protozoa.…”
Section: Saponinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In investigations conducted by Benchaar et al (2008) no negative effect was found of 60 g YSE (containing 10% saponin) per cow a day on the total numbers and the distribution by genera of ruminal ciliate protozoa. Similarly, other authors did not show any such effect (Hristov et al, 2003;Bahh et al, 2007). The observed differences may have been caused by the amount of applied saponins (Hristov et al, 2004).…”
Section: Saponinsmentioning
confidence: 77%