1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00059-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of seven PCR-based assays for the analysis of microchimerism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transplanted solid organs contain mature lymphocytes capable of inducing GvHD as well as small numbers of HSCs. It has been known for some time that many recipients of solid organ transplants become microchimeric post-transplant [11].…”
Section: Microchimerism and Solid Organ Transplanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transplanted solid organs contain mature lymphocytes capable of inducing GvHD as well as small numbers of HSCs. It has been known for some time that many recipients of solid organ transplants become microchimeric post-transplant [11].…”
Section: Microchimerism and Solid Organ Transplanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must also be noted that the majority of such studies have been performed on female recipients of male, whole unfiltered blood. This allows for the design of highly specific PCR strategies to be directed at regions of the Y chromosome, alleviating problems caused by interference of recipient DNA [20].…”
Section: Peri-mortem Blood Transfusion and Microchimerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Regardless of the assay used, the detection of rare populations of cells in blood remains challenging. Assays range in sensitivity from 0.1% male DNA in a female DNA background using single primer pairs for the Y chromosome to 0.0001% with nested primers.…”
Section: Survival Of Transfused Donor White Blood Cells 275mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assays range in sensitivity from 0.1% male DNA in a female DNA background using single primer pairs for the Y chromosome to 0.0001% with nested primers. 35 Different primers may lead to different amplification efficiencies, and inadvertent mispriming of associated material, such as pseudogenes in the recipient, has led to false-positive results because of misinterpretation of the bands as of donor origin. 36 We controlled for this possibility by running coded preand posttransfusion samples from each case together.…”
Section: Survival Of Transfused Donor White Blood Cells 275mentioning
confidence: 99%