2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of serological tests for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in dogs: Optimization of cut off titers and inhibition studies of cross-reactivity with Toxoplasma gondii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
56
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique would be especially useful in dogs, for which current serological techniques lack the sensitivity and specificity of those used in bovines (Silva et al 2007, Ghalmi et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique would be especially useful in dogs, for which current serological techniques lack the sensitivity and specificity of those used in bovines (Silva et al 2007, Ghalmi et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a protozoan coccidian parasite that structurally resembles and is genetically related to Toxoplasma gondii (Silva et al, 2007). There are two species of Neospora currently recognized: N. caninum which causes clinical disease in dogs, cattle, sheep, equines and many wild animal species, and Neospora hughesi, which has been associated with reproductive losses and myoencephalitis in horses.…”
Section: Neosporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parasite has been reported to be the most important cause of abortion and neonatal mortality in beef and dairy cattle populations worldwide including Ethiopia (Murray, 2006;Silva et al, 2007;Asmare et al, 2012).…”
Section: Neosporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum samples showing fluorescence at the dilution of 1:50 (cutoff value) were further tittered using twofold serial dilutions (Dubey et al, 1988a(Dubey et al, , 1988b. The entire surface fluorescence of tachyzoite was considered positive (Silva et al, 2007). On each slide, a negative and a positive control were included.…”
Section: Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Testmentioning
confidence: 99%