2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling frequency, window size and sensor position for classification of sheep behaviour

Abstract: Automated behavioural classification and identification through sensors has the potential to improve health and welfare of the animals. Position of a sensor, sampling frequency and window size of segmented signal data has a major impact on classification accuracy in activity recognition and energy needs for the sensor, yet, there are no studies in precision livestock farming that have evaluated the effect of all these factors simultaneously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of position (ear an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
97
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in Table 4 show basic evaluation measures for diagnosing by symptoms which achieves high‫‬ accuracy with percentage 0.97 % with error rate 0.03%. Table 5 shows its confusion matrix.For testing and evaluating performance of diagnosing by chest xray images, (155 chest x-ray images) were collected and classified by five experts in domain, then divided into four classes as shown in Table 6 Table7 shows statistical measures applied to determine the efficiency of diagnosing by images [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in Table 4 show basic evaluation measures for diagnosing by symptoms which achieves high‫‬ accuracy with percentage 0.97 % with error rate 0.03%. Table 5 shows its confusion matrix.For testing and evaluating performance of diagnosing by chest xray images, (155 chest x-ray images) were collected and classified by five experts in domain, then divided into four classes as shown in Table 6 Table7 shows statistical measures applied to determine the efficiency of diagnosing by images [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates this process. The first phase classification was performed using our previously published algorithms in Walton et al [11], where we focused on the development of classification algorithms for standing, walking and lying in sheep, while the second phase classification was developed in the current study where we explicitly focus on discriminating between lame and nonlame samples within each of the different behaviours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we extend our previous algorithmic approach [11] to classify sheep activity, using an earbased accelerometer and gyroscope sensor to investigate for the first time (i) if we could detect lameness in sheep using both accelerometer and gyroscope signals, (ii) which machine learning algorithms perform best at classifying lameness and what are the most important features for lameness classification and (iii) if we can classify lameness in sheep across a range of daily activities (walking, standing and lying).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which included the evaluation of different window sizes (3s, 5s and 7s) with 50% overlap between two adjacent windows. In the research, the research involved two stages which were first to determine the best window sizes and second to obtain the highest performance of classifier used [31]. Based on previous researches also, it is mentioned that the shorter the window size, the faster a movement detection and at the same time improve the energy expenditure while larger window sizes are more suitable for complex movement recognition [27,30].…”
Section: Effect Of Window Size In Movement Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%