2017
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9057
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Potencies of Immune Globulin Products Against Hepatitis A

Abstract: Results | The anti-HAV IgG potency of GammaQuin was significantly higher than that of all the other preparations, followed by Beriglobin. Gamma-globulin, Subgam, and all the GamaSTAN S/D lots were not significantly different from each other (Figure , A). The anti-HAV neutralizing potency of GammaQuin was significantly higher than that of the other 8 preparations (Figure, B). Correlation between immunoassayand ARTA-derived potencies was high (Pearson coefficient, 0.95; P = .002).Modeling of anti-HAV IgG decay i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The twelve pools described in the preceding paragraph were also used to determine how differences in anti-HAV Ig titers relate to the capacity to neutralize HAV in vitro. High-titer plasma pools from the El Paso-TX center demonstrated a significantly greater capacity to neutralize HAV than the plasma pools from the mid-titer Midwest City-OK center, confirming that elevated anti-HAV Ig titers associate with greater inhibition of HAV infection in vitro, which is consistent with previous observations 10 . More importantly, the neutralization result underscores the clinical benefit plasma from these high-titer centers provides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The twelve pools described in the preceding paragraph were also used to determine how differences in anti-HAV Ig titers relate to the capacity to neutralize HAV in vitro. High-titer plasma pools from the El Paso-TX center demonstrated a significantly greater capacity to neutralize HAV than the plasma pools from the mid-titer Midwest City-OK center, confirming that elevated anti-HAV Ig titers associate with greater inhibition of HAV infection in vitro, which is consistent with previous observations 10 . More importantly, the neutralization result underscores the clinical benefit plasma from these high-titer centers provides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of HAV, declining overall rates of hepatitis A infection, due particularly to increased vaccine coverage beginning in the mid-1990s, have had the effect of reducing naturally-acquired anti-HAV titers among adult plasma donors [4][5][6][7][8][9] . Consequently, available IG preparations have been found to fall short of potency expectations 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, declining concentrations of anti-HAV (IgG) antibodies in plasma pools have raised concern regarding the efficacy of IG in PEP. 149 The safety profile of IG administration is excellent, except in recipients with IgA deficiency. Coadministration of IG with vaccines, such as measles, mumps, rubella, varicella and active HAV vaccines may partially blunt or neutralise the immune response of the particular vaccine.…”
Section: Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 Non-or low-response to inactivated HAV vaccines, previously linked to lack of a putative HAV receptor on T cells, is very rare 155 (See reviews on the humoral and cellular immune responses to HAV vaccines). 27,73,75,[145][146][147][148][149][150]154,155 Vaccine potency assays using a WHO international reference serum, and/or in-house assays, are used to compare vaccine biologic activity between manufacturers and results expressed in units or in microgram per weight. Two types of hepatitis A vaccines are currently used worldwide: a) Formalin-inactivated (''killed") hepatitis A virus vaccines.…”
Section: Active Immunisation With Hepatitis a Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of hepatitis A antibodies in the IMIG available may account for at least some of the dosing variation. 25,26,50 Neither passive immunization nor vaccination is used to prevent rubella post-exposure in most circumstances. Vaccination is recommended for non-pregnant contacts to provide ongoing protection against future rubella exposures.…”
Section: Intravenousmentioning
confidence: 99%