2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measurements as a reliable tool to measure acceptability of the taste of paediatric medicines in an inpatient paediatric population

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate the age appropriateness and suitability of patient-reported outcome measures to assess the acceptability of the taste of oral liquid medicines in children.Design and settingAn observational mixed-methods study involving children aged 2–16 years taking oral liquid medicine in paediatric inpatient wards across the West Midlands (UK). Assessment tools included patient-reported scores on the taste of medicines via a five-point Facial Hedonic Scale; a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); a question, ‘D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mothers had indicated which foods their child should not eat due to allergies beforehand; children performed their taste test using only the foods that were permitted by their mothers (total N = 1; removed red/pink Starburst containing red food dye). Consistent with the original paradigm used in the proposed age range (Cutting et al, 1999 ; Fisher and Birch, 1999 ), children were instructed to taste each of the foods and provide a rating from 1 to 5 using a smiling-face scale where 1 = “very tasty” and 5 = “not very tasty” validated for use in the assessment of taste in pediatric populations (Mistry et al, 2018 ). Children were encouraged to complete the taste test within 5 minutes, and were then told that they had to remain in the room while their mother completed her surveys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers had indicated which foods their child should not eat due to allergies beforehand; children performed their taste test using only the foods that were permitted by their mothers (total N = 1; removed red/pink Starburst containing red food dye). Consistent with the original paradigm used in the proposed age range (Cutting et al, 1999 ; Fisher and Birch, 1999 ), children were instructed to taste each of the foods and provide a rating from 1 to 5 using a smiling-face scale where 1 = “very tasty” and 5 = “not very tasty” validated for use in the assessment of taste in pediatric populations (Mistry et al, 2018 ). Children were encouraged to complete the taste test within 5 minutes, and were then told that they had to remain in the room while their mother completed her surveys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Liquid medicines have long been considered the most appropriate oral dosage form for children and young people (CYP); however, support is increasing for solid dosage forms to be used more frequently due to their better stability profile, suitability for coating to taste mask and the inclusion of a lower number of excipients. 5 There is increasing evidence to show that tablets are an acceptable dosage form and a suitable alternative to liquids which can overcome the challenges associated with liquid medicines. [6][7][8][9] The ability of CYP to swallow tablets is of importance to the pharmaceutical sector, healthcare professionals and patients themselves.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hedonic scores were used as an indicator of acceptability. Criteria to demonstrate acceptability was defined as a hedonic score ≤3 (neutral or positive face) [25]. Acceptable/unacceptable hedonic scores were then tested for association with other acceptability measures using Wilcoxon rank test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%