2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502013001000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of nutritional indicators and body composition in patients with advanced liver disease enrolled for liver transplantation

Abstract: PURPOSE: Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with advanced liver disease (LD) related to multifactorial causes. Fluid retention can underestimate the nutritional status based on anthropometric measures. We evaluated nutritional indicators and body composition (BC) in patients with liver cirrhosis and correlated them with LD severity. METHODS:Forty three patients with LD enrolled for liver transplantation were evaluated by Anthropometric measures, subjective evaluation (Global Assessment of Nutritional Sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both MAMA and corrected MAMA are associated with clinical risk, including a prediction of the length of hospital stay in surgical patients (Almeida et al ., ) and an increased risk of mortality in the elderly and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Miller et al ., ; Soler‐Cataluña et al ., ; Enoki et al ., ). Although MAMA has been described as preferable to MAMC on the basis of correlation with creatinine/height index (Trowbridge et al ., ; Gibson, ), the advantages are small and there is little evidence that it is a better predictor of body composition or health risk in adults (Scalfi et al ., ; Vulcano et al ., ). Therefore, because MAMC is marginally easier to calculate, it is reasonable to use this in nutritional assessment.…”
Section: Skinfold Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MAMA and corrected MAMA are associated with clinical risk, including a prediction of the length of hospital stay in surgical patients (Almeida et al ., ) and an increased risk of mortality in the elderly and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Miller et al ., ; Soler‐Cataluña et al ., ; Enoki et al ., ). Although MAMA has been described as preferable to MAMC on the basis of correlation with creatinine/height index (Trowbridge et al ., ; Gibson, ), the advantages are small and there is little evidence that it is a better predictor of body composition or health risk in adults (Scalfi et al ., ; Vulcano et al ., ). Therefore, because MAMC is marginally easier to calculate, it is reasonable to use this in nutritional assessment.…”
Section: Skinfold Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, adopting SGA as a tool to diagnose malnutrition revealed that 92.2% of patients were Medhat et al 227 malnourished, 50.5% of them were severely malnourished, and 41.7% of them were moderately malnourished, this percentage is higher than that found by Vulcano et al (2013), where they found that 46.5% of the cirrhotic patients suffering from different degree of malnutrition according to SGA (Vulcano et al, 2013). Also this study results were higher than that of Teiusanue et al (2012), where 76% of the patients were well nourished, 15% of the patients were mild to moderately malnourished and 9% only were severely malnourished (Teiusanue et al, 2012).…”
Section: Grads Of Body Mass Indexmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, protein calorie malnutrition (PCM) itself may accelerate deterioration of liver functions and adversely affects its clinical outcome (Plauth et al, 2000). PCM considered a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality before and after transplantation as well as in abdominal surgery (Vulcano et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmental BIA is also used to overcome fluid retention in patients. As opposed to MF-BIA, single-frequency BIA (SI-BIA) might cause the underestimation of body composition [76]. It is usually performed with four electrodes.…”
Section: Nutritional Assessment Of Cirrhotic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%