Evaluation of natural emotions using self assessment manikins

A Methodology for the Extraction of Reader's Emotional State Triggered from Text Typography

“…The "large-size fonts" (27 points and higher) have similar impact with "small size fonts". Table 1 The statistical analysis of our results, is based on the approach used by (Grimm & Kroschel, 2005) on listeners' emotional state assessment. From equations (1), (2), (3) and (4), the resulting mean values of the participants-evaluators confidence scores ( k r ) are shown in Table 2 Fig …”

Emotion Estimation in Speech Using a 3D Emotion Space Concept

“…Then he/she was asked to select the best describing image for each primitive. This evaluation method yields one reference value for each primitive i ∈ {valence, activation, dominance} and each utterance n. The individual listener ratings were averaged using confidence scores as described in (Grimm & Kroschel, 2005a). One half of the database was evaluated by 17 listeners, the other by 6 listeners, which was due to the fact that the second half of the database was recorded and evaluated later, when only a smaller number of evaluators was available.…”

“…A group of evaluators listened to the emotional sentences and assessed the emotional content. For this human evaluation we used the Self Assessment Manikins (Fischer, et al, 2002;Grimm & Kroschel, 2005a). In this method five images were offered per emotion primitive.…”

COGNIMUSE: a multimodal video database annotated with saliency, events, semantics and emotion with application to summarization

“…All annotators evaluated all clips, with five (out of seven) performing the entire process twice to allow the validation of intraannotator agreement. Expected emotion was derived from the individual experienced emotion annotations using a correlation-based scheme similar to that in [78] with particularly uncorrelated annotations being rejected as outliers. Intended emotion annotations were performed three times by a single expert, expected to be very consistent.…”