2017
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1407364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of industrial by-products and natural minerals for phosphate adsorption from subsurface drainage

Abstract: Agricultural subsurface drainage has been recognized as an important pathway for phosphorus transport from soils to surface waters. Reactive permeable filters are a promising technology to remove phosphate from subsurface drainage. Three natural minerals (limestone, zeolite, and calcite) and five industrial by-products (steel slag, iron filings, and three recycled steel by-products) were evaluated for phosphate removal from subsurface drainage using batch adsorption experiments. Phosphate adsorption onto these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phosphate average removal capacity of iron filings was 416.1 mg/kg, which was ≈3 times higher than that of limestone (155.2 mg/kg) ( Table 2). Similar results were reported by Sellner et al [14] that five industrial by-products (1.68-4.95 mg/g), including iron filings, steel slag, and three steel chips, exhibited approximately one order of magnitude higher phosphate adsorption capacity than that of three nature minerals (0.10-0.13 mg/g) including limestone, calcite, and zeolite at 20 °C in batch experiments. The phosphate removal by iron filings was attributed to Fe-P precipitation and P sorption on iron filings and its corrosion products [22,42].…”
Section: Removal Of Phosphatesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The phosphate average removal capacity of iron filings was 416.1 mg/kg, which was ≈3 times higher than that of limestone (155.2 mg/kg) ( Table 2). Similar results were reported by Sellner et al [14] that five industrial by-products (1.68-4.95 mg/g), including iron filings, steel slag, and three steel chips, exhibited approximately one order of magnitude higher phosphate adsorption capacity than that of three nature minerals (0.10-0.13 mg/g) including limestone, calcite, and zeolite at 20 °C in batch experiments. The phosphate removal by iron filings was attributed to Fe-P precipitation and P sorption on iron filings and its corrosion products [22,42].…”
Section: Removal Of Phosphatesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In particular, according to its composition and porosity, BF slag has showed the highest catalytic activity to degrade TCE by using hydrogen peroxide [48]. Recently, some industrial by-products, such as steel slag, iron filings and three recycled steel by-products, have been tested for their abilities for phosphate adsorption, showing a higher ability to do so compared to three natural minerals (limestone, zeolite and calcite) [49]. Due to the strong chemical bonds between phosphate and steel by-products, the adsorbed phosphate can be released to the solution.…”
Section: Removal Of Harmful Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high amount of Fe in the slag present as Fe-oxides, mainly wüstite and magnetite, may play a role in phosphate removal. Sellner et al [47] reported that steel chips and iron filings remove phosphate more effectively than natural minerals and steel slag and attributed the removal to surface complexes, electrostatic adsorption and Fe-phosphate precipitation. A secondary Ca-and Fe-phosphate mixed phase was identified on reacted slag from the legacy-slag-filled column (Figure 7b).…”
Section: Phosphate Removal Mechanisms and Chemistry Of Reacted Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important consideration for field implementation is the potential to release phosphate back into solution. Sellner et al [47] found that steel slag showed much less phosphate desorption (less than 1% for batch experiments) than other materials such as limestone. Sellner et al [47] suggested that strong chemical bonds are formed between the slag and phosphate, potentially preventing phosphate release when phosphate concentrations or other chemical constituents vary in the treatment water.…”
Section: Phosphate Removal Mechanisms and Chemistry Of Reacted Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation