2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2012.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of glottal closure instant detection in a range of voice qualities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of creaky voice was measured using the Voice Analysis Toolkit [24]. The Peak Slope measure [25] calculated from a wavelet-based decomposition of the speech signal into octave bands was used to differentiate breathy and tense voice qualities.…”
Section: Voice Quality Features (Voi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of creaky voice was measured using the Voice Analysis Toolkit [24]. The Peak Slope measure [25] calculated from a wavelet-based decomposition of the speech signal into octave bands was used to differentiate breathy and tense voice qualities.…”
Section: Voice Quality Features (Voi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugman gives a brief review focused on GCI detection (Thomas Durgman, 2011). In another brief review, the GCI detection over a range of voice qualities was discussed, with emphasis on GCI detection in modal and non-modal phonation (Kane and Gobl, 2013b). The non-modal phonation display varying glottal source characteristics which include voices like creaky, breathy, tense, harsh and falsetto.…”
Section: Glottal Closure Instant Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several refinements suggested to improve the GCI detection from the LP residual. A recent one is based on filtering the LP residual with a resonator located at approximately at F 0 (Kane and Gobl, 2013b).…”
Section: Glottal Closure Instant Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a quantitative review of five advanced GCI detection algorithms (Drugman et al 2012), SEDREAMS and ZFR are two best performing techniques in terms of robustness. The SEDREAMS has been later enhanced to better handle voice qualities of different phonation types (Kane and Gobl 2013), but this study only takes the fundamental implementation into account. Both methods start their processing from the speech signal sðnÞ.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%