2014
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-47-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of feature-based methods for automated network orientation

Abstract: Every day new tools and algorithms for automated image processing and 3D reconstruction purposes become available, giving the possibility to process large networks of unoriented and markerless images, delivering sparse 3D point clouds at reasonable processing time. In this paper we evaluate some feature-based methods used to automatically extract the tie points necessary for calibration and orientation procedures, in order to better understand their performances for 3D reconstruction purposes. The performed te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, they suffer from variable precision, strongly dependent on the pattern present on surveyed objects, as well as the difficulty of having little control of the achievable accuracy at the geometric and morphological levels (Apollonio et al, 2014;Guidi & Remondino, 2012).…”
Section: Geometry Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, they suffer from variable precision, strongly dependent on the pattern present on surveyed objects, as well as the difficulty of having little control of the achievable accuracy at the geometric and morphological levels (Apollonio et al, 2014;Guidi & Remondino, 2012).…”
Section: Geometry Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays the most popular and used operator to run the initial phase of the SfM pipeline (images matching) is the SIFT method (Lowe, 2004) for interest point detection/description and the use of the Euclidean distance criteria for the matching. SIFT failures case are changes in the illumination conditions, reflecting surfaces, object/scene with strong 3D aspect, highly repeated structures in the scene and very different viewing angle between the images (Apollonio et al, 2014). We run an optimized implementation of the ASIFT algorithm (Morel & Yu, 2009) aiming to correct the SIFT failures in case of very different viewing angles.…”
Section: Photogrammetric Data Acquisition and 3d Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other feature detectors, (Apollonio et al, 2014) evaluate SIFT (Lowe, 2004) and ASIFT (Morel and Yu, 2009) for terrestrial imagery. While they do not find a clear overall winner, we have found ASIFT to work notably well with archaeologial oblique aerial images .…”
Section: Feature Matching Facing Large Perspective Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%