1994
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.1994.1047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Endophytic Bacteria as Potential Biological-Control Agents for Oak Wilt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
59
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These endophytic bacteria could take effect by limiting the invasion of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense; the mechanism may range from outcompetition of the pathogen to production of antibiotics to induction of system resistance (Bacon and Hinton, 2002;Brooks et al, 1994). Wilt disease of the banana plant may be inhibited by a diverse endophytic bacteria community maintaining the pathogen spores below the level that is required for expression of pathogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These endophytic bacteria could take effect by limiting the invasion of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense; the mechanism may range from outcompetition of the pathogen to production of antibiotics to induction of system resistance (Bacon and Hinton, 2002;Brooks et al, 1994). Wilt disease of the banana plant may be inhibited by a diverse endophytic bacteria community maintaining the pathogen spores below the level that is required for expression of pathogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples include nitrogen fixation, antibacterial and antifungal activities, as well as plant growth promotion (Brooks et al, 1994;Berg et al, 2005;Tan et al, 2006;Rijavec et al, 2007). Other roles such as synthesis of novel chemicals, resistance to heavy metals and xenobiotic degration have been observed in isolated endophytes (Siciliano et al, 2001;Ryan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a biocontrol agent of fungal pathogens has been also explored (Zhang and Yuen, 1999). Most of the antagonistic endophytic bacteria identified in this study, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Bacillus, Microbacterium and Paenibacillus, are already defined for the antagonism and plant growth promotion as biocontrol agent Brooks et al, 1994;Rosenblueth and Martínez-Romero, 2006;Singh et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bacteria on the root surface and in the rhizosphere benefit plants. In particular, some bacteria residing in the interior of plant tissues and intercellular spaces provide benefits to the host, which include plant growth promotion and induction of plant defense mechanisms, by providing growth-stimulating or resistance-inducing substances or producing antibiotics for outcompeting fungal pathogens Brooks et al, 1994;Chert et al, 1995;Chung et al, 2010;Chung et al, 2008;Ryu et al, 2003), without causing harm (Schulz and Boyle, 2006). The bacteria benefit by being protected from the competitive and high-stress environment of the soil compared to bacteria restricted to the rhizosphere and the rhizoplane (Rosenblueth and Martínez-Romero, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%