2017
DOI: 10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_20_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin for ridge preservation after atraumatic extraction: A case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Sharma & cols, 40 in their study conducted in 2020, in which they investigated about wound healing and bone regeneration, by clinical and radiographic evaluation found that it was higher in the PRF test group (4.21±5.1mm) compared to the control group (3.2±4.09 mm) (p>0.05), they also indicate that PRF accelerates bone formation in the alveolus post-extraction. 39 Shilpa & cols, 41 in 2017 in their study in which they evaluated the post-exodontic alveolar bone level of dental pieces, by periapical radiographic analysis said that the test group had better PRF bone regeneration (14.1±10.mm), indicating that ridge preservation using PRF is an effective procedure for implant placement. 40 Srinivas & cols, 42 in 2018 evaluated in their study alveolar bone height and postexodontic bone density by histological and radiographic evaluation, they reported that, if there were significant differences in the test group in relation to the control group, alveolar height (p<0.001), bone density (p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 Sharma & cols, 40 in their study conducted in 2020, in which they investigated about wound healing and bone regeneration, by clinical and radiographic evaluation found that it was higher in the PRF test group (4.21±5.1mm) compared to the control group (3.2±4.09 mm) (p>0.05), they also indicate that PRF accelerates bone formation in the alveolus post-extraction. 39 Shilpa & cols, 41 in 2017 in their study in which they evaluated the post-exodontic alveolar bone level of dental pieces, by periapical radiographic analysis said that the test group had better PRF bone regeneration (14.1±10.mm), indicating that ridge preservation using PRF is an effective procedure for implant placement. 40 Srinivas & cols, 42 in 2018 evaluated in their study alveolar bone height and postexodontic bone density by histological and radiographic evaluation, they reported that, if there were significant differences in the test group in relation to the control group, alveolar height (p<0.001), bone density (p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they observed better bone regeneration in the test group so they corroborate that the use of PRF helps in the preservation of the alveolus. 41 Sultan & cols, 43 2020, conducted a study where bone healing was evaluated by clinical and radiographic analysis, they showed that the difference was insignificant between test and control group (p>0.05), they also said that PRF showed no difference in dimensional and volumetric changes, but could show clinical benefits for alveolar augmentation. 42 Sybil & cols, 44 , in their 2020 study investigated bone healing by radiographic analysis, and reported that they observed significant differences for patient symptom relief, but not for hard tissue healing with respect to cortical bone, PRF (1.44±0.77mm) at 6 months, compared to the control group (1.76±0.83mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, alveolar dimensions preservation following tooth extraction is crucial to maintaining adequate bone volume for implants placement and stabilization to obtain optimal esthetic and functional prosthetic results (3) . Ridge preservation measures consist of the use of varied bone substitutes, barrier membranes, and biologically active materials and several different surgical methods (4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%