2008
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e318168ef82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Different Methods of 18F-FDG-PET Target Volume Delineation in the Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: PET-based tumor volumes are strongly affected by the choice of threshold level. Quantitatively, GTVs derived from visual inspection of the region of high FDG uptake do not significantly differ from GTVref in this cohort of patients. The inclusion of alternative FDG-PET segmentation data, other than visual inspection, may reduce target volumes significantly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, since FDG PET images show substantial contrast in glucose utilization between normal tissue and neoplastic tissue, threshold-based segmentation is one of the easier methods to adopt and implement. 20,28,[30][31][32] However, most threshold methods (T 25 and T 40 ) fail to identify a single threshold that includes the entire tumor in the presence of pronounced heterogeneities. 7 To overcome this methodological shortcoming, we used the interactive GrowCut algorithm implemented in the 3D Slicer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, since FDG PET images show substantial contrast in glucose utilization between normal tissue and neoplastic tissue, threshold-based segmentation is one of the easier methods to adopt and implement. 20,28,[30][31][32] However, most threshold methods (T 25 and T 40 ) fail to identify a single threshold that includes the entire tumor in the presence of pronounced heterogeneities. 7 To overcome this methodological shortcoming, we used the interactive GrowCut algorithm implemented in the 3D Slicer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27]33,46 This is especially true in the context of evaluating FDG-PET segmentation methods, where the task of interest is the estimation of volumetric metrics such as MTV and TLG. 33,47,48 However, an issue with these taskbased evaluations is the lack of knowledge about the true value of the metric. In this manuscript, the use of the NGS framework to address this issue in evaluating FDG-PET segmentation methods has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the attempts so far have shown a large variability of tumour delineation based on different imaging techniques [34,35], but have provided little guidance on how to effectively reach beyond CT-based tumour volume definition. Part of the reason for this lies in the fact that methodologies for extraction of tumour volumes from other imaging modalities are not satisfactory and have led to large inherent uncertainties between different techniques [36][37][38]. Clearly more work needs to be done, first to better understand the pathological extent of tumours and its relation to different types of imaging; and second, to better explore ways to make imaging more quantitative than it is currently.…”
Section: Target Definition Incorporating Biological Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%