2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00445.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in the detection of 16S rDNA sequence variation in rhizobia and methanotrophs

Abstract: The ability of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) technique to resolve 16S rDNA products generated from two different collections of bacteria using universal 16S primers was investigated. Alignments of 16S rDNA sequences of known species of rhizobia and methanotrophs were performed in order to determine the genetic variations within a 200 bp product obtained with PCR primers which amplify the 16S rRNA encoding genes from Eubacteria. Theoretical DNA melting curves were obtained with the Melt87 progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…DGGE, in spite of its bias and all its limitations, including low coverage (Muyzer et al, 1993;Van Wintzingerode , 1997;Muyzer & Smalla, 1998;Farnleitner et al, 2004), is an adequate method when the aim is to compare patterns along a process or over different sites (Gilbert et al, 2012;Ling et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2012). Although DGGE may also be used to assess phylogenetic diversity, a major drawback is the poor resolution, when different nucleotide sequences co-migrate in a single band, violating the rule one-band-one-organism assumed in this technique (Vallaeys et al, 1997). Nevertheless, it is possible through band cloning to overcome such a difficulty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DGGE, in spite of its bias and all its limitations, including low coverage (Muyzer et al, 1993;Van Wintzingerode , 1997;Muyzer & Smalla, 1998;Farnleitner et al, 2004), is an adequate method when the aim is to compare patterns along a process or over different sites (Gilbert et al, 2012;Ling et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2012). Although DGGE may also be used to assess phylogenetic diversity, a major drawback is the poor resolution, when different nucleotide sequences co-migrate in a single band, violating the rule one-band-one-organism assumed in this technique (Vallaeys et al, 1997). Nevertheless, it is possible through band cloning to overcome such a difficulty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of bands in a DGGE does not necessarily reflect the actual diversity of the microbial community. One band may represent several species with identical partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (Vallaeys et al, 1997), but on the other hand, one species may also produce more than one band because of multiple, heterogeneous rRNA operons (Dahllof et al, 2000). The richness analysis must, therefore, be interpreted as an indication rather than an absolute measure of the microbial diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comigration of PCR products from different species within the same peak is a common limitation of fingerprinting methods (Kowalchuk et al , 1997; Vallaeys et al , 1997; Piceno et al , 1999; Casamayor et al , 2000). In our study, we checked this constraint in detail by running the CE‐SSCP signature of 80 individual clones in parallel to the natural complex assemblage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%