1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(96)80080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of coronal microleakage after endodontic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Saunders and Saunders [4] reported that poor coronal sealing was a major cause of nonsurgical endodontic treatment failure. The placement of an intraorifice barrier immediately following root filling could reduce coronal leakage in root-canal-treated teeth [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saunders and Saunders [4] reported that poor coronal sealing was a major cause of nonsurgical endodontic treatment failure. The placement of an intraorifice barrier immediately following root filling could reduce coronal leakage in root-canal-treated teeth [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that G/S alone leaks and that a placement of orifice plugs may be beneficial to prevent the microleakage (14,15). The objective of this study was to further evaluate the effects of orifice plugs using IRM or dentin bonding/composite resin on coronal leakage in vivo where the root canals were exposed to oral environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• temporary restorations in teeth with only an access cavity 52,63,65,67,[84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93] -with thermocycling 52,63,67,90,91,93 -with loading 92 -with thermocycling and mechanical loading, 84 • extensive interim restorations after thermal stress, 76 • extensive interim restorations with access cavities but no loading or thermocycling, 29 • moderate interim restorations with access cavity, thermocycling and the different interfaces between the materials, and 14,51 • access cavities cut through 'permanent' restorations. 39 Despite the large number of studies that have been carried out, none have examined the integrity of interim restorations after cyclic loading.…”
Section: S89mentioning
confidence: 99%