1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(99)80023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] Nevertheless, a single plate may be used in cases of more restricted exposure of the subcondylar and ramus regions compared with the other regions to avoid facial nerve damage and if there is a lack of space to place two plates. Yang and Patil [3] argue that subcondylar fractures may also be successfully treated by using a single miniplate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] Nevertheless, a single plate may be used in cases of more restricted exposure of the subcondylar and ramus regions compared with the other regions to avoid facial nerve damage and if there is a lack of space to place two plates. Yang and Patil [3] argue that subcondylar fractures may also be successfully treated by using a single miniplate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pilling et al [11], after comparative evaluation often different condylar base fracture osteosynthesis techniques, concluded that osteosynthesis with two miniplates would be the most stable way of treating a condylar fracture. Using an in vitro model, Choi et al [3], demonstrated that a two-miniplate system applied to the anterior and posterior regions of the condylar neck was more stable than a single-plate system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was difficult to accurately assess treatment results of the different plating techniques because the number of cases in their study was very limited. Using an in vitro model, Choi et al [3] demonstrated that a 2-miniplate system applied to the anterior and posterior regions of the condylar neck was more stable than a single-plate system. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate a sample of patients who had sub condylar fractures treated with 2 different plating techniques and to demonstrate which plating technique provides functionally stable fixation for fractures of mandibular sub condylar region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still no consensus about the optimal fixation method for condylar process fractures 19 . The research mainly use jaws from fresh human cadavers 16,26,27 , polyurethane replica of mandibles [19][20][21][22] and, recently, finite element methods 18,[23][24][25] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains the poor primary stability of most schemes that used only one plate on the ramus posterior border. Even stronger or two superimposed plates (lock, dynamic compression or reconstruction) can fail or break when used alone 27 . The main reason for this is that even they have been more robust plates, they are not positioned in the correct anatomical site to support the physiological forces.…”
Section: Non Computational Biomechanical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%