Construction Research Congress 2003
DOI: 10.1061/40671(2003)118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Computer Anatomic Modeling for Analyzing Pre-Construction Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the work presented in this paper was implemented from a more practical perspective. The state of the art method of face-to-face design review in mechanical trades is now employing 3D paper-based drawings [31]. Since industrial practitioners are familiar with the 3D paper drawing method, positive results from comparing MR tool against 3D paper method can persuade them to move toward the adoption of MR/AR to change the way they work.…”
Section: Relevant Work and Research Motivationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the work presented in this paper was implemented from a more practical perspective. The state of the art method of face-to-face design review in mechanical trades is now employing 3D paper-based drawings [31]. Since industrial practitioners are familiar with the 3D paper drawing method, positive results from comparing MR tool against 3D paper method can persuade them to move toward the adoption of MR/AR to change the way they work.…”
Section: Relevant Work and Research Motivationmentioning
confidence: 98%