2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of common TBM performance prediction models based on field data from the second lot of Zagros water conveyance tunnel (ZWCT2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For traditional TBMs, there are several methods to elaborate this calcu-lus. A detail study about can be found in (Hassanpour, Vanani et al 2016), which concluded that the accuracy of the main performance prediction method is reasonable. According to (Zare, Bruland et al 2016), one of the most accepted and widely used is the performance method prediction proposed by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology -NTNU.…”
Section: Prediction Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For traditional TBMs, there are several methods to elaborate this calcu-lus. A detail study about can be found in (Hassanpour, Vanani et al 2016), which concluded that the accuracy of the main performance prediction method is reasonable. According to (Zare, Bruland et al 2016), one of the most accepted and widely used is the performance method prediction proposed by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology -NTNU.…”
Section: Prediction Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, Yagiz developed a relationship between rock mass properties and PR. Hassanpour et al (2009Hassanpour et al ( , 2010Hassanpour et al ( , 2011Hassanpour et al ( , 2016 investigated TBM performance based on the Field Penetration Index (FPI). Zhao (2007, 2009) and Gong et al (2007) introduced the index of boreability and rock brittleness to investigate the rock mass characteristics that affect the performance of TBM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various methods and equations to predict PR [9,10], each has its own characteristics [11,12] due to site specific rock mass parameters and machine specifications [13,14]. TBMs penetration rate is the first and most important step in predicting the time of tunneling project [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%