2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of classical interatomic potentials for molecular dynamics simulations of borosilicate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant peaks at 1.85, 2.9, 5.3, 8.06, and 12.75 Å −1 are marked as guidelines for comparison between experimental and simulated spectra. The shapes of the structure factors are comparable with two commercial borosilicate glasses studied previously 64 . The locations of the major peaks are in good agreement between experimental and simulation results, indicating that MD generated reasonable structural models for the ISG‐A n and ISG‐A n N glasses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Significant peaks at 1.85, 2.9, 5.3, 8.06, and 12.75 Å −1 are marked as guidelines for comparison between experimental and simulated spectra. The shapes of the structure factors are comparable with two commercial borosilicate glasses studied previously 64 . The locations of the major peaks are in good agreement between experimental and simulation results, indicating that MD generated reasonable structural models for the ISG‐A n and ISG‐A n N glasses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The shapes of the structure factors are comparable with two commercial borosilicate glasses studied previously. 64 The locations of the major peaks are in good agreement between experimental and simulation results, indicating that MD generated reasonable structural models for the ISG-An and ISG-AnN glasses. For the ISG-An series, no significant changes are observed for the first sharp differential peak (FSDP, at 1.85 Å −1 ) as Al concentration increases.…”
Section: Structure Factor S(q)supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cutoffs for calculating all different bonds are reported in Table 3, which are based on the pair distribution functions. 21 The average bond lengths of Si-O, B-O, B-Si, and B-B remain the same regardless of the large molar volume change (~2 GPa), which is consistent with previous studies on SiO 2 and B 2 O 3 glasses. 38,40 The average bond length of Si-Si has a very small change (~0.015 Å/GPa).…”
Section: F I G U R Esupporting
confidence: 91%