2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cephalometric indices in patients with obstructive sleep apnea in comparison with healthy individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed cut-off values are <10-11 mm for IPAS, <77 • for SNB, and >67 • for NSGn [26][27][28][29]. However, these definitions remain indistinctive because of their markedly overlapping value range between the affected and non-affected groups and, thus, the insufficient diagnostic selectivity [30]. Most published values were obtained with patients sitting or standing in an upright position, distinguishing the three-dimensional complexity of the anatomical conditions from the two-dimensional measurements on a single spatial plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed cut-off values are <10-11 mm for IPAS, <77 • for SNB, and >67 • for NSGn [26][27][28][29]. However, these definitions remain indistinctive because of their markedly overlapping value range between the affected and non-affected groups and, thus, the insufficient diagnostic selectivity [30]. Most published values were obtained with patients sitting or standing in an upright position, distinguishing the three-dimensional complexity of the anatomical conditions from the two-dimensional measurements on a single spatial plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-dimensional cephalometric factors associated with SASN, RSAV, and OSAS are discussed in a highly controversial manner [26][27][28][29][30]. Moreover, there is little information available with regard to additional three-dimensional parameters or the correlation of two-dimensional parameters with three-dimensional airway morphology [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%