2001
DOI: 10.1080/014311601750038857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are generally consistent with those reported in the literature. Li et al (2012) reported that HH/HV was the best dual polarization for rice mapping, and Baghdadi et al (2001) found HV to be the best overall for wetland classification with both HH and HV better than VV. Hess, Melack, and Simonett (1990) also reported that HH or VV can Figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are generally consistent with those reported in the literature. Li et al (2012) reported that HH/HV was the best dual polarization for rice mapping, and Baghdadi et al (2001) found HV to be the best overall for wetland classification with both HH and HV better than VV. Hess, Melack, and Simonett (1990) also reported that HH or VV can Figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of fully polarimetric SAR (HH/HV/VH/VV channels) could provide additional information on the structure and moisture of the vegetation, thus improving the utility of SAR data for wetland mapping [1,10,11]. However, the sources of fully polarimetric spaceborne SAR data are limited to the C-band Radarsat-2 and the L-band ALOS-PALSAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have evaluated the utility of SAR for wetland mapping using single and multi-date single channel SAR data [16][17][18], and others have evaluated polarimetric SAR [19][20][21][22][23]. The horizontal send and horizontal receive (HH) polarization of SAR systems have long been known to improve distinction of swamp from other wetland classes and uplands [9,10,19,24,25] due to an enhanced double bounce effect from the water surface to the tree trunks and back to the sensor (or vice versa). Non-flooded forests have more diffuse scatter from the ground surface, and less energy is returned to the SAR sensor than for flooded forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%